All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Owen Anderson <oanderso@google.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Don't lookup full CPU state in the indirect branch fast path on AArch64 when running in user mode.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:52:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKs3XfJnyuZi85=7iX2eG2viP+X893qBGG=a7dAtd8=ovN-p9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKs3XfJPrMGxdAouGCje3ppnWKA6fXpNaywQ5rj9u45VkPuUXg@mail.gmail.com>

Ping.

I'd like to get feedback on how/whether this could be developed into a
landable version.

Thanks,

--Owen

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:32 PM Owen Anderson <oanderso@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to request feedback on the following patch, which I do
> not believe should be applied to master as-is.  The idea here is to
> avoid gathering the full CPU state in the fast path of an indirect
> branch lookup when running in user mode on a platform where the flags
> can only be changed in privileged mode.  I believe this is true on the
> AArch64 scenario that I care about, but clearly not true in general.
> I'm particularly seeking feedback on how to clean this up into a
> version that checks the correct necessary and sufficient conditions to
> allow all users that can benefit from it to do so.
>
> On the workload that I am targeting (aarch64 on x86), this patch
> reduces execution wall time by approximately 20%, and eliminates
> indirect branch lookups from the hot stack traces entirely.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --Owen
>
> From 3d96db17d3baacb92ef1bc5e70ef06b97d06a0ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Owen Anderson <oanderso@google.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:47:00 -0700
> Subject: [RFC] Don't lookup full CPU state in the indirect branch fast path on
>  AArch64 when running in user mode.
>
> Most of the CPU state can't be changed in user mode, so this is useless work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Owen Anderson <oanderso@google.com>
> ---
>  include/exec/tb-lookup.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/exec/tb-lookup.h b/include/exec/tb-lookup.h
> index 9cf475bb03..f4ea0eb4c0 100644
> --- a/include/exec/tb-lookup.h
> +++ b/include/exec/tb-lookup.h
> @@ -25,7 +25,15 @@ tb_lookup__cpu_state(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong
> *pc, target_ulong *cs_base,
>      TranslationBlock *tb;
>      uint32_t hash;
>
> +#if !defined(TARGET_ARM) || !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>      cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, pc, cs_base, flags);
> +#else
> +    if (is_a64(env)) {
> +      *pc = env->pc;
> +    } else {
> +      *pc = env->regs[15];
> +    }
> +#endif
>      hash = tb_jmp_cache_hash_func(*pc);
>      tb = qatomic_rcu_read(&cpu->tb_jmp_cache[hash]);
>
> @@ -34,12 +42,19 @@ tb_lookup__cpu_state(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong
> *pc, target_ulong *cs_base,
>
>      if (likely(tb &&
>                 tb->pc == *pc &&
> +#if !defined(TARGET_ARM) || !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>                 tb->cs_base == *cs_base &&
>                 tb->flags == *flags &&
> +#endif
>                 tb->trace_vcpu_dstate == *cpu->trace_dstate &&
>                 (tb_cflags(tb) & (CF_HASH_MASK | CF_INVALID)) == cf_mask)) {
>          return tb;
>      }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +    cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, pc, cs_base, flags);
> +#endif
> +
>      tb = tb_htable_lookup(cpu, *pc, *cs_base, *flags, cf_mask);
>      if (tb == NULL) {
>          return NULL;
> --
> 2.28.0.709.gb0816b6eb0-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 21:32 [RFC] Don't lookup full CPU state in the indirect branch fast path on AArch64 when running in user mode Owen Anderson
2020-10-12 20:52 ` Owen Anderson [this message]
2020-10-19 17:16   ` Owen Anderson
2020-10-19 18:22 ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-19 22:44   ` Owen Anderson
2020-10-19 22:58     ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKs3XfJnyuZi85=7iX2eG2viP+X893qBGG=a7dAtd8=ovN-p9g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=oanderso@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.