From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 07:43:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: architecture specific UEFI setup In-Reply-To: <20200205055334.4072-1-xypron.glpk@gmx.de> References: <20200205055334.4072-1-xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 05:53, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > RISC-V booting currently is based on a per boot stage lottery to determine > the active CPU. The Hart State Management (HSM) SBI extension replaces > this lottery by using a dedicated primary CPU. > > Cf. Hart State Management Extension, Extension ID: 0x48534D (HSM) > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc > > In this scenario the id of the active hart has to be passed from boot stage > to boot stage. Using a UEFI variable would provide an easy implementation. > > This patch provides a weak function that is called at the end of the setup > of U-Boot's UEFI sub-system. By overriding this function architecture > specific UEFI variables or configuration tables can be created. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra OK, so I have a couple of questions: - does RISC-V use device tree? if so, why are you not passing the active hart via a property in the /chosen node? I'd assume the EFI stub would not care at all about this information, and it would give you a Linux/RISC-V specific way to convey this information that is independent of EFI. - using variables to pass information from firmware to OS only is overkill, and config tables are preferred, given that they only require access to the system table. If required, a RISC-V specific data structure containing boot parameters could be installed as a configuration table, and the address passed to the startup code in the kernel proper [rather than just a hart id], allowing you to put any piece of information you like in there. Config tables work fine with kexec, btw. It is up to the first OS to memblock_reserve() the table to guarantee that it is still there at kexec time, but this applies equally to all other data structures passed as config tables. Alternatively, in this case, you can stipulate that it is passed as AcpiReclaim [ignore the 'Acpi' in the name] which is intended for firmware tables (and we never reclaim it in linux) I'd also recommend that RISC-V adopt the same principle as ARM does when it comes to EFI: call SetVirtualAddressMap in the stub, so that the kernel proper always sees the same handover state, regardless of kexec. Additionally, you shouldn't ever modify the EFI memory map provided by the firmware, so that the kexec kernel sees the exact same version. > --- > v2: > reference the Hart State Management Extension in the commit message > --- > include/efi_loader.h | 3 +++ > lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h > index d4c59b54c4..d87de85e83 100644 > --- a/include/efi_loader.h > +++ b/include/efi_loader.h > @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ extern efi_uintn_t efi_memory_map_key; > extern struct efi_runtime_services efi_runtime_services; > extern struct efi_system_table systab; > > +/* Architecture specific initialization of the UEFI system */ > +efi_status_t efi_setup_arch_specific(void); > + > extern struct efi_simple_text_output_protocol efi_con_out; > extern struct efi_simple_text_input_protocol efi_con_in; > extern struct efi_console_control_protocol efi_console_control; > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c > index de7b616c6d..8469f0f43c 100644 > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c > @@ -22,6 +22,17 @@ void __weak allow_unaligned(void) > { > } > > +/** > + * efi_setup_arch_specific() - architecture specific UEFI setup > + * > + * This routine can be used to define architecture specific variables > + * or configuration tables, e.g. HART id for RISC-V > + */ > +efi_status_t __weak efi_setup_arch_specific(void) > +{ > + return EFI_SUCCESS; > +} > + > /** > * efi_init_platform_lang() - define supported languages > * > @@ -179,6 +190,11 @@ efi_status_t efi_init_obj_list(void) > if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) > goto out; > > + /* Architecture specific setup */ > + ret = efi_setup_arch_specific(); > + if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) > + goto out; > + > out: > efi_obj_list_initialized = ret; > return ret; > -- > 2.24.1 >