From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756159AbdKCSLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:11:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:44050 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753059AbdKCSLs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:11:48 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SYc7lxfD2STn5Qr0pbiNZIEc9i3Tjqz+vzNo8fBvfAfD287p9kAAUVe2FP2NUWA1X+u6uK7U0bOIUfHDQj6t8= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171103180913.whp2tdjjvs32f4lz@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20171103171203.107569-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20171103175156.f44o7kuxgzym3pbt@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20171103180913.whp2tdjjvs32f4lz@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:11:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO To: Mark Rutland Cc: Sami Tolvanen , Kees Cook , LKML , Greg Hackmann , Matthias Kaehlcke , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: ently compile > What's the minimum set of patches necessary to work with clang (ignoring > LTO)? If you have a build of clang-5, then just patch 7 in this series to work around the last compiler bug. If you build clang from source from master, ToT, for arm64, then none. :) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ndesaulniers@google.com (Nick Desaulniers) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:11:45 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO In-Reply-To: <20171103180913.whp2tdjjvs32f4lz@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20171103171203.107569-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20171103175156.f44o7kuxgzym3pbt@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20171103180913.whp2tdjjvs32f4lz@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: ently compile > What's the minimum set of patches necessary to work with clang (ignoring > LTO)? If you have a build of clang-5, then just patch 7 in this series to work around the last compiler bug. If you build clang from source from master, ToT, for arm64, then none. :)