From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037D9C4338F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFD4600CD for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229943AbhG0RnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:43:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36958 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229529AbhG0RnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:43:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1ABC061757 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id r26so23062558lfp.5 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:43:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nmLHKY9I4CGQfN2ZPpRZEfbaLo1/Jmuu/tBLcFgmWqI=; b=O6olwX22wZaWUsVLlewr8wmScUxvy+vMZCDjpljm3H5qjVu7264PITXktbAyTXtOUS hr1cmfIFSwNa48+OhbXxWeuZHYXXPiHCdmBO1lRkKCbv+wQBUNIQfqvermJqW8i/bGaC Bc46IgoaLMJCEmXoRkZA4l3ChMgHrA+lhE6fFjBCRbbrQRfpZQzRHzsxd5yUHI4AxbdW txnqjXIht88WFCDniP3x8Bo05Et6GYugu6w+bbZPzJ++Uwpnm539a94yssyV1hAwNmU5 VzaE9upKJ4z+Qclyok5OkoPMDoryGIvTOykJxEfFmtSamJrZz6rXNqEwf4hAQq+XGLBF rybg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nmLHKY9I4CGQfN2ZPpRZEfbaLo1/Jmuu/tBLcFgmWqI=; b=QNWqG5o5kGnKtEWbRBHjlGDn2i/n00QL+WbuuLA+VIELUQOR7qe3npBzHKpzPreuX0 /KWmxlQ0+GRSvowQylfjvGhelpDkXcg4WQok8azrncIIfdAm6i7X6KmeV+j4PgDqR55t tKE9dQb7jv9MNOzQ+gR6IhTJ3rSQ+aps0b5pPO8N11jXD2IRWkP7fp+Z2glICGlqSAGb 0mBuEC2Ux8remo4sORjXKN4q33s/FPNX6CFfgepBvlwxKyZfsx5wE+Q/vPNZ4464O223 +cdXsMyOGOqBwRHB46fA9ztcXPEVJVRYScqZ3EksA0Qb8EwiToaoxxxW8gzyomPaukkm D/eA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532c32T3hwDkNK4MnYUYDFwsrezv+jAH+y/c/ny8yJLVXMr/dGqP ivgiFWw5yS8hq7JOqmh0G3sOvLq7Sjkw03GB2I4zSw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8tOIr+r2spv1zjUK0FuqSqK7MIcG28J63mumEoj3kFNmK7+bLge2xGlcf7x7rYa8NRAsMO8vLjpvDZCffFqU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e0c:: with SMTP id i12mr17116556lfv.122.1627407786575; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:43:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210714091747.2814370-1-morbo@google.com> <20210726201924.3202278-1-morbo@google.com> <20210726201924.3202278-2-morbo@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:42:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] base: mark 'no_warn' as unused To: Bill Wendling Cc: Nathan Chancellor , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , clang-built-linux , LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:41 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:15:52PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:27 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 01:47:33PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > + Greg and Rafael as the maintainer and reviewer of drivers/base/module.c > > > > > respectively, drop everyone else. > > > > > > > > Odd no one cc:ed us originally, I guess they didn't want the patch ever > > > > merged? :( Oh, I just noticed this patch was part of a series. Perhaps you ran get_maintainer.pl on one patch of the series, and used that list for all patches in the series? Since these patches are orthogonal (ie. they don't depend on any order relative to one another; they can go in separately via different trees and their maintainers) consider not using a series. That should save you from having to write a TPS Report^W^Wcover letter. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers