From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f173.google.com (mail-pg1-f173.google.com [209.85.215.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A753382 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-f173.google.com with SMTP id h193so2530493pgc.10 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:01:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oQ4iusZn3r+L1hT830DTYjpIyjYe1oSN3vop8euZ9js=; b=dX+k1YnOeAISPqobM+n+g0B46aJ5fAG0J2icXb75RVgG7m4M4JAPreDmVp9TF/QWCx SIYxqYixGj5DCJ6xRMUmqee0H6CdlOFz6QrWkpC8hOaHc43jy0B+bY2R7jhmFP6IOUjQ ZBCWl4wpzdiWXhB5fM0kK+rNoQ+eN33Dr39xn2rBc+htjyWsMzNQsbm4wgHWFhPbAp9v kjNlUwAYLJ5lAupS13Ed36qmjFUCvJki24AMPeH8mwZk+ryLrqd+XSY53Gjpge338tAM focXQhiB6s1N7m5+FGGICce46iDvv5MvpJfmOwJmmMcNN8wX2F0frI8KoPt4xc8vsFOS do/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=oQ4iusZn3r+L1hT830DTYjpIyjYe1oSN3vop8euZ9js=; b=sye1pymEhfU1lzlmoTiwd35Hkxgb/K+WgHusGcFpBi5o8W0TROC1TlRgAYWZ4WvegP 2VzJXutvLKHp6BgYMnZBsu2k1vOWkgCuyBazY2xjXhFo4MBnGFpc0FnwIql5rK62BbQv rR6zsjNydVeq42dEPbPq2lxv2YYk5+4Zy8w0eby5cDNwcPBcy05/qPsJyCj71s7KZY3z 6JoAT8a6+NiMYgh9HWqV6/5vUrMbDqI5OjKTR5qXbo3RGjzeOhkRxgGcXeYCQQDcTZ6v QNldfkxDBce/vhioKZHnt5Rctg+glOG+I+PYTC4GRfGA7plajeb5wdX0zlgx4H/xQ7WC 2P5A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3KPMGq8TbqDG8/K6Tjx429BeJTEseCpvM5i4wQsBVNEzwUyTc3 oowCo4n4A8G6UEbwI2eZwSwQhvn81UkOOlaJLEhHxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6cMvQ+CdiTjFykH6PT7aBlUZq2UXynv4j2dxgS4TWMNFM/mgc0MVvi+yNwuV9l3w/SgxLXb/1R37Erlf0LIZw= X-Received: by 2002:a63:586:0:b0:46f:75bb:cfc4 with SMTP id 128-20020a630586000000b0046f75bbcfc4mr3099016pgf.403.1668106874281; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:01:14 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221106095106.849154-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> <20221106095106.849154-3-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <20221106095106.849154-3-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:01:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: Use __builtin_clz*() to evaluate constant expressions To: Vincent Mailhol Cc: x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yury Norov , llvm@lists.linux.dev, Borislav Petkov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 1:51 AM Vincent Mailhol wrote: > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > -static __always_inline int fls64(__u64 x) > +static __always_inline int constant_fls64(u64 x) > +{ > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long long) != sizeof(x)); Thanks for the patches! They LGTM; but why do we need this BUILD_BUG_ON here? > + > + if (!x) > + return 0; > + > + return BITS_PER_TYPE(x) - __builtin_clzll(x); > +} -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers