From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Gryniewicz Subject: Re: cmake Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:15:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20151203152436.73e15e38@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <20151203223020.GB17144@ultraspiritum.redhat.com> <20151203170347.33867061@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <295720458.28620860.1449188812348.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20151204015942.19951132@lembas.zaitcev.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:34701 "EHLO mail-wm0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752834AbbLDOQS (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:16:18 -0500 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so76511211wmv.1 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:16:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151204015942.19951132@lembas.zaitcev.lan> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Matt Benjamin , "Adam C. Emerson" , ceph-devel On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:26:52 -0500 (EST) > Matt Benjamin wrote: > >> Could you share the branch you are trying to build? (ceph/wip-5073 would not appear to be it.) > > It's the trunk with a few of my insignificant cleanups. > > But I found a fix: deleting the CMakeFiles/ and CMakeCache.txt let > it run. Thanks again for the tip about the separate build directory. > FWIW, many cmake issues can be fixed by nuking the cmake generated files. This is one of the big advantages to a separate build dir, since the simplest way to do this is to nuke the build dir. Daniel