From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] ARM: EXYNOS5: add machine specific support for LCD
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:02:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL1wa8ewGH7ujNaA5=zn-B2WYQoRuifZ0bbza_dKttCp33csmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1342591053-7092-1-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com>
 <1342591053-7092-4-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com> <009b01cd64b1$0019eb20$004dc160$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
 <CAL1wa8c1Ty2xz7qsTWixTqvmHc1LC+nEahd7wUgQEHWUPHY9UQ@mail.gmail.com> <018c01cd6641$5182dad0$f4889070$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <018c01cd6641$5182dad0$f4889070$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, jg1.han@samsung.com, joshi@samsung.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, thomas.ab@samsung.com, olofj@google.com
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Hello Marek,

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:22 PM Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>
>> Hello Marek,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:57 AM Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch adds machine specific support for LCD controller like setting power to LCD
>> >> and adding LCD platform device.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Prathyush K <prathyush.k@samsung.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-
>> dt.c
>> >> index e7113cc..02a0e68 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
>> >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> >>  #include <linux/serial_core.h>
>> >>  #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h>
>> >>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> >>
>> >>  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>> >>  #include <asm/hardware/gic.h>
>> >> @@ -24,6 +25,7 @@
>> >>  #include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
>> >>
>> >>  #include "common.h"
>> >> +#include <video/platform_lcd.h>
>> >>
>> >>  static int smdk5250_bl_notify(struct device *unused, int brightness)
>> >>  {
>> >> @@ -47,6 +49,55 @@ static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data smdk5250_bl_data = {
>> >>       .notify         = smdk5250_bl_notify,
>> >>  };
>> >>
>> >> +static void lcd_set_power(struct plat_lcd_data *pd,
>> >> +                     unsigned int power)
>> >> +{
>> >> +
>> >> +     /* reset */
>> >> +     gpio_request_one(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "GPX1");
>> >> +
>> >> +     mdelay(20);
>> >> +     if (power) {
>> >> +             /* fire nRESET on power up */
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 0);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 1);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_free(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5));
>> >> +     } else {
>> >> +             /* fire nRESET on power off */
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 0);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 1);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_free(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5));
>> >> +     }
>> >> +     mdelay(20);
>> >> +
>> >> +     /*
>> >> +      * Request lcd_bl_en GPIO for smdk5250_bl_notify().
>> >> +      * TODO: Fix this so we are not at risk of requesting the GPIO
>> >> +      * multiple times, this should be done with device tree, and
>> >> +      * likely integrated into the plat-samsung/dev-backlight.c init.
>> >> +      */
>> >> +     gpio_request_one(EXYNOS5_GPX3(0), GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "GPX3");
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int smdk5250_match_fb(struct plat_lcd_data *pd, struct fb_info *info)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     /* Don't call .set_power callback while unblanking */
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct plat_lcd_data smdk5250_lcd_data = {
>> >> +     .set_power      = lcd_set_power,
>> >> +     .match_fb       = smdk5250_match_fb,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct platform_device smdk5250_lcd = {
>> >> +     .name                   = "platform-lcd",
>> >> +     .dev.platform_data      = &smdk5250_lcd_data,
>> >> +};
>> >>  /*
>> >>   * The following lookup table is used to override device names when devices
>> >>   * are registered from device tree. This is temporarily added to enable
>> >> @@ -85,6 +136,10 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata exynos5250_auxdata_lookup[]
>> __initconst
>> >> = {
>> >>       {},
>> >>  };
>> >>
>> >> +static struct platform_device *smdk5250_devices[] __initdata = {
>> >> +     &smdk5250_lcd, /* for platform_lcd device */
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >>  static void __init exynos5250_dt_map_io(void)
>> >>  {
>> >>       exynos_init_io(NULL, 0);
>> >> @@ -96,6 +151,7 @@ static void __init exynos5250_dt_machine_init(void)
>> >>       samsung_bl_set(&smdk5250_bl_gpio_info, &smdk5250_bl_data);
>> >>       of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table,
>> >>                               exynos5250_auxdata_lookup, NULL);
>> >> +     platform_add_devices(smdk5250_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(smdk5250_devices));
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  static char const *exynos5250_dt_compat[] __initdata = {
>> >
>> > Sorry, but this patch looks completely weird to me. exynos5-dt machine is aimed to
>> > operate on ANY Exynos5 based board with proper device tree bindings, not only SMDK5250.
>> > Please add DT support to platform lcd driver and create required bindings for it
>> > instead of hardcoding the platform data and gpio numbers in mach-exynos5-dt.c
>> >
>>
>> Yes true, that GPIO numbers will vary for boards.
>> Can you please confirm that platform lcd driver means the core
>> "drivers/video/backlight/platform_lcd.c" file.
>
> Yes, by lcd driver I meant that driver.
>
>> But platform lcd driver is used by other(non samsung) platforms also.
>> So, If I add the DT suppot to that file, I have to test the changes on
>> other platforms also.
>> Can you please kindly suggest me some other way to overcome this situation.
>
> Just check that you don't break existing code. For some examples please refer to the DT
> changes in drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c (see commit fd05d08920). You can also check
> if the driver works fine after your changes by setting it up from platform data instead of
> DT.
>

I came across some links for adding DT support to platform-lcd driver
posted by Thomas Abraham.
And because of some reasons it was not accepted.
Here is the link for the discussion happened on this topic
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1201.0/00089.html

He has posted some patches for lcd panel power control, so can I go
ahead and extend this driver to meet our requirements?
Here is the link for the patch set
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-March/091412.html

Best Wishes,
Leela Krishna Amudala


> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung Poland R&D Center
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: l.krishna@samsung.com (Leela Krishna Amudala)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:02:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/7] ARM: EXYNOS5: add machine specific support for LCD
In-Reply-To: <018c01cd6641$5182dad0$f4889070$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
References: <1342591053-7092-1-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com>
 <1342591053-7092-4-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com>
 <009b01cd64b1$0019eb20$004dc160$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
 <CAL1wa8c1Ty2xz7qsTWixTqvmHc1LC+nEahd7wUgQEHWUPHY9UQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <018c01cd6641$5182dad0$f4889070$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <CAL1wa8ewGH7ujNaA5=zn-B2WYQoRuifZ0bbza_dKttCp33csmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello Marek,

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:22 PM Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>
>> Hello Marek,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:57 AM Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch adds machine specific support for LCD controller like setting power to LCD
>> >> and adding LCD platform device.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Prathyush K <prathyush.k@samsung.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-
>> dt.c
>> >> index e7113cc..02a0e68 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
>> >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> >>  #include <linux/serial_core.h>
>> >>  #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h>
>> >>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> >>
>> >>  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>> >>  #include <asm/hardware/gic.h>
>> >> @@ -24,6 +25,7 @@
>> >>  #include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
>> >>
>> >>  #include "common.h"
>> >> +#include <video/platform_lcd.h>
>> >>
>> >>  static int smdk5250_bl_notify(struct device *unused, int brightness)
>> >>  {
>> >> @@ -47,6 +49,55 @@ static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data smdk5250_bl_data = {
>> >>       .notify         = smdk5250_bl_notify,
>> >>  };
>> >>
>> >> +static void lcd_set_power(struct plat_lcd_data *pd,
>> >> +                     unsigned int power)
>> >> +{
>> >> +
>> >> +     /* reset */
>> >> +     gpio_request_one(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "GPX1");
>> >> +
>> >> +     mdelay(20);
>> >> +     if (power) {
>> >> +             /* fire nRESET on power up */
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 0);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 1);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_free(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5));
>> >> +     } else {
>> >> +             /* fire nRESET on power off */
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 0);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_set_value(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5), 1);
>> >> +             mdelay(20);
>> >> +             gpio_free(EXYNOS5_GPX1(5));
>> >> +     }
>> >> +     mdelay(20);
>> >> +
>> >> +     /*
>> >> +      * Request lcd_bl_en GPIO for smdk5250_bl_notify().
>> >> +      * TODO: Fix this so we are not at risk of requesting the GPIO
>> >> +      * multiple times, this should be done with device tree, and
>> >> +      * likely integrated into the plat-samsung/dev-backlight.c init.
>> >> +      */
>> >> +     gpio_request_one(EXYNOS5_GPX3(0), GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "GPX3");
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int smdk5250_match_fb(struct plat_lcd_data *pd, struct fb_info *info)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     /* Don't call .set_power callback while unblanking */
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct plat_lcd_data smdk5250_lcd_data = {
>> >> +     .set_power      = lcd_set_power,
>> >> +     .match_fb       = smdk5250_match_fb,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct platform_device smdk5250_lcd = {
>> >> +     .name                   = "platform-lcd",
>> >> +     .dev.platform_data      = &smdk5250_lcd_data,
>> >> +};
>> >>  /*
>> >>   * The following lookup table is used to override device names when devices
>> >>   * are registered from device tree. This is temporarily added to enable
>> >> @@ -85,6 +136,10 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata exynos5250_auxdata_lookup[]
>> __initconst
>> >> = {
>> >>       {},
>> >>  };
>> >>
>> >> +static struct platform_device *smdk5250_devices[] __initdata = {
>> >> +     &smdk5250_lcd, /* for platform_lcd device */
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >>  static void __init exynos5250_dt_map_io(void)
>> >>  {
>> >>       exynos_init_io(NULL, 0);
>> >> @@ -96,6 +151,7 @@ static void __init exynos5250_dt_machine_init(void)
>> >>       samsung_bl_set(&smdk5250_bl_gpio_info, &smdk5250_bl_data);
>> >>       of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table,
>> >>                               exynos5250_auxdata_lookup, NULL);
>> >> +     platform_add_devices(smdk5250_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(smdk5250_devices));
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  static char const *exynos5250_dt_compat[] __initdata = {
>> >
>> > Sorry, but this patch looks completely weird to me. exynos5-dt machine is aimed to
>> > operate on ANY Exynos5 based board with proper device tree bindings, not only SMDK5250.
>> > Please add DT support to platform lcd driver and create required bindings for it
>> > instead of hardcoding the platform data and gpio numbers in mach-exynos5-dt.c
>> >
>>
>> Yes true, that GPIO numbers will vary for boards.
>> Can you please confirm that platform lcd driver means the core
>> "drivers/video/backlight/platform_lcd.c" file.
>
> Yes, by lcd driver I meant that driver.
>
>> But platform lcd driver is used by other(non samsung) platforms also.
>> So, If I add the DT suppot to that file, I have to test the changes on
>> other platforms also.
>> Can you please kindly suggest me some other way to overcome this situation.
>
> Just check that you don't break existing code. For some examples please refer to the DT
> changes in drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c (see commit fd05d08920). You can also check
> if the driver works fine after your changes by setting it up from platform data instead of
> DT.
>

I came across some links for adding DT support to platform-lcd driver
posted by Thomas Abraham.
And because of some reasons it was not accepted.
Here is the link for the discussion happened on this topic
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1201.0/00089.html

He has posted some patches for lcd panel power control, so can I go
ahead and extend this driver to meet our requirements?
Here is the link for the patch set
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-March/091412.html

Best Wishes,
Leela Krishna Amudala


> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung Poland R&D Center
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html