All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs/244: add test case to verify the behavior of deleting non-existing device
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:48:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H7-SQS3--oijfty8SRnqqbwCi8S0dGrymKc1_NVe1Mq3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806113333.328261-1-wqu@suse.com>

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 4:44 PM Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> wrote:
>
> There is a kernel regression for btrfs, that when passing non-existing
> devid to "btrfs device remove" command, kernel will crash due to NULL
> pointer dereference.
>
> The test case is for such regression, it will:
>
> - Create and mount an empty single-device btrfs
> - Try to remove devid 3, which doesn't exist for above fs
> - Make sure the command exits properly with expected error message
>
> The kernel fix is titled "btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference when
> deleting device by invalid id".
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2:
> - Change the subject to also verify the error behavior
> - Include the error message into golden output
> - Also verify the return value of btrfs command
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/244     | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/244.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/244
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/244.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/244 b/tests/btrfs/244
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..fbefeedf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/244
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2021 SUSE Linux Products GmbH.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 244
> +#
> +# Make sure "btrfs device remove" won't crash when non-existing devid
> +# is provided
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick volume dangerous
> +
> +# Override the default cleanup function.
> +# _cleanup()
> +# {
> +#      cd /
> +#      rm -r -f $tmp.*
> +# }
> +
> +# Import common functions.
> +# . ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Above created fs only contains one device with devid 1, device remove 3
> +# should just fail with proper error message showing devid 3 can't be found.
> +# Although on unpatched kernel, this will trigger a NULL pointer dereference.
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device remove 3 $SCRATCH_MNT
> +ret=$?
> +
> +if [ $ret -ne 1 ]; then
> +       echo "Unexpected return value from btrfs command, has $ret expected 1"
> +fi

I think I would just do "-eq 0" instead, but it's more about a
preferred style than anything else, and can always be changed later if
needed.

Looks good, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

> +
> +# Fstests will automatically check the filesystem to make sure metadata is not
> +# corrupted.
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/244.out b/tests/btrfs/244.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..629adf2a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/244.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 244
> +ERROR: error removing devid 3: No such file or directory
> --
> 2.31.1
>


-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06 11:33 [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs/244: add test case to verify the behavior of deleting non-existing device Qu Wenruo
2021-08-06 11:42 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-08-06 12:15   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-10 14:04   ` David Sterba
2021-08-06 15:48 ` Filipe Manana [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL3q7H7-SQS3--oijfty8SRnqqbwCi8S0dGrymKc1_NVe1Mq3w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.