From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eZoQH-0003Kc-W5 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 01:46:23 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b5so7268277itc.3 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:46:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Robert Jones Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:46:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Problems Configuring VHT160 and VHT80+80 for QCA9984 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k Hello, I'm working with a WLE1216V5-20 ath10k wave 2 card using QCA9984 chipset and having problems configuring an AP for VHT160 or 80+80 mode. The hostapd v2.6 tool in both cases tells me that the "Driver does not support configured VHT capability". I'm using the custom board and firmware .bin files found at http://www.candelatech.com/ath10k-10.4.php. I see on the same page that they recommend using one of Ben Greear's kernels but I would prefer to stick with a mainline 4.14 if possible. Is this capability truly missing from the ath10k driver or am I misconfiguring something in my hostapd.conf? If the former, can anyone point me to a patch set that I can apply to the ath10k driver to support either of these two modes? Regards, Robert Jones _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k