All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:13:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1P8qXasSPmUmzqrkHvAneRmr9ucR0X7wmcRpUF8gtb0TQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318102550.59265-4-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Number of rx queue and number of rx port in lcore config are constants
> during the period of l3 forward application running. But compiler has
> no this information.
>
> Copied values from lcore config to local variables and used the local
> variables for iteration. Compiler can see that the local variables are
> not changed, so qconf reloads at each iteration can be eliminated.
>
> The change showed 1.8% performance uplift in single core, single port,
> single queue test on N1SDP platform with MLX5 NIC.

At least, in octeontx2, I dont see any performance improvement.
But change looks good. Please find below a comment.

>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> index 3dcf1fef1..d338590b9 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> @@ -190,14 +190,16 @@ lpm_main_loop(__rte_unused void *dummy)
>         lcore_id = rte_lcore_id();
>         qconf = &lcore_conf[lcore_id];
>
> -       if (qconf->n_rx_queue == 0) {
> +       uint16_t n_rx_q = qconf->n_rx_queue;
> +       uint16_t n_tx_p = qconf->n_tx_port;

How about adding const?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-13 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18 10:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] examples/l3fwd: tune prefetch for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:50   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-13 20:00     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-19  7:52     ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:40   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:43   ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-04-14  6:02     ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 19:06   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-21  5:22     ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-04-26 10:55       ` Walsh, Conor
2021-04-27  1:19         ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13  8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:33   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-16  9:39 ` Ling, WeiX
2021-06-01  7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01  7:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: reorganize code for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:34     ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-01  7:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01  7:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:39     ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-10  6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10  6:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10  6:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-05  8:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALBAE1P8qXasSPmUmzqrkHvAneRmr9ucR0X7wmcRpUF8gtb0TQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.