From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754302AbbLKWMs (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:12:48 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:34166 "EHLO mail-oi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753481AbbLKWMr (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566B4931.5080806@zytor.com> References: <1CB621EF-1647-463B-A144-D611DB150E15@zytor.com> <20151208223135.GA8352@kroah.com> <87oae0h2bo.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <56677DE3.5040705@zytor.com> <20151209012311.GA11794@kroah.com> <84B136DF-55E4-476A-9CB2-062B15677EE5@zytor.com> <20151209013859.GA12442@kroah.com> <20151209083225.GA30452@1wt.eu> <87wpskyds7.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20151211210400.GL20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87h9jovgf7.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <566B4931.5080806@zytor.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:12:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] devpts: Sensible /dev/ptmx & force newinstance To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Al Viro , Greg KH , Jiri Slaby , Linus Torvalds , Aurelien Jarno , Florian Weimer , Serge Hallyn , Jann Horn , "security@kernel.org" , "security@ubuntu.com >> security" , security@debian.org, Willy Tarreau , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:07 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/11/15 13:48, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Eric W. Biederman >> wrote: >>> Al Viro writes: >>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:40:40PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>>> >>>>> + inode = path.dentry->d_inode; >>>>> + filp->f_path = path; >>>>> + filp->f_inode = inode; >>>>> + filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping; >>>>> + path_put(&old); >>>> >>>> Don't. You are creating a fairly subtle constraint on what the code in >>>> fs/open.c and fs/namei.c can do, for no good reason. You can bloody >>>> well maintain the information you need without that. >>> >>> There is a good reason. We can not write a race free version of ptsname >>> without it. >> >> As long as this is for new userspace code, would it make sense to just >> add a new ioctl to ask "does this ptmx fd match this /dev/pts fd?" >> > > For the newinstance case st_dev should match between the master and the > slave. Unfortunately this is not the case for a legacy ptmx, as a > stat() on the master descriptor still returns the st_dev, st_rdev, and > st_ino for the ptmx device node. Sure, but I'm not talking about stat. I'm saying that we could add a new ioctl that works on any ptmx fd (/dev/ptmx or /dev/pts/ptmx) that answers the question "does this ptmx logically belong to the given devpts filesystem". Since it's not stat, we can make it do whatever we want, including following a link to the devpts instance that isn't f_path or f_inode. --Andy