All of
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <>
To: Andy Lutomirski <>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	"" <>,
	X86 ML <>,
	"" <>,
	stable <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Remove the b2b parameter from nmi_handle
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:08:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski <> wrote:
> It has never had any effect.  Remove it for comprehensibility.
> Cc'd to stable because whatever to do with improve the NMI mess will
> probably depend on this.
> Cc:

Peter, if you've already queued this up, can you remove the Cc: stable
and the comment about stable?  I have a totally different short-term
fix for the back-to-back NMI mess.  I make no guarantee at all that
it's a full fix, but it fixes the case my test exercises quite nicely.

I still think this patch makes sense as a cleanup.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-20 18:52 Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21  0:08 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2015-07-21  9:37 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/nmi: Remove the 'b2b' parameter from nmi_handle () tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Remove the b2b parameter from nmi_handle' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.