From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756220AbcJNS10 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:27:26 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:33386 "EHLO
        mail-vk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752483AbcJNS1T (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:27:19 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzo0xpbxbajpgcfyYoLyKihCiyMfgc+yCJ+b9ohw6wycQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1475257877.git.luto@kernel.org> <CALCETrULWhzph=kpbQUQSEkmsm6ZaRtp_bV9j5LFaFjLkawwMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzo0xpbxbajpgcfyYoLyKihCiyMfgc+yCJ+b9ohw6wycQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:26:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCETrUW-apzUuqcA+ApaeUzvL6DD-9Hy5Yesd2AUcScmX+xhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ABI CHANGE!!! Remove questionable remote SP reads
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>>
>> Ping!
>>
>> We need to decide fairly soon whether to apply these (or perhaps just
>> patch 1 or just patches 2 and 3) for 4.9.  For any parts that aren't
>> applied, I'll send quick fixups to pin the stack in the offending
>> code.
>
> I think we should apply it. Hopefully nothing uses it, and nobody will
> notice. And if somebody *does* notice, the sooner we find out, the
> better.
>

Ingo?  If we're going to make this change, I think it would be nice to
do it before -rc1.  If not, I want to get the alternate fix in ASAP.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ABI CHANGE!!! Remove questionable remote SP reads
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:26:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCETrUW-apzUuqcA+ApaeUzvL6DD-9Hy5Yesd2AUcScmX+xhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1475257877.git.luto@kernel.org> <CALCETrULWhzph=kpbQUQSEkmsm6ZaRtp_bV9j5LFaFjLkawwMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzo0xpbxbajpgcfyYoLyKihCiyMfgc+yCJ+b9ohw6wycQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzo0xpbxbajpgcfyYoLyKihCiyMfgc+yCJ+b9ohw6wycQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, X86 ML <x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>, Jann Horn <jann-XZ1E9jl8jIdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>, Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ping!
>>
>> We need to decide fairly soon whether to apply these (or perhaps just
>> patch 1 or just patches 2 and 3) for 4.9.  For any parts that aren't
>> applied, I'll send quick fixups to pin the stack in the offending
>> code.
>
> I think we should apply it. Hopefully nothing uses it, and nobody will
> notice. And if somebody *does* notice, the sooner we find out, the
> better.
>

Ingo?  If we're going to make this change, I think it would be nice to
do it before -rc1.  If not, I want to get the alternate fix in ASAP.