All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Stephane Eranian" <eranian@google.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	root <chenggang.qin@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"秦承刚(承刚)" <chenggang.qcg@taobao.com>,
	"Wu Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@gmx.de>,
	"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@gmail.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Ahern" <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"秦承刚(承刚)" <chenggang.qcg@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"Yanmin Zhang" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Move task_pt_regs sampling into arch code
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 08:13:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW6cv_s60uzi_scy5JBdr4+wrz1O5we-3okc-SZKRVofA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150105140754.GF29390@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

n Jan 5, 2015 6:08 AM, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 10:36:19AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On x86_64, at least, task_pt_regs may be only partially initialized
> > in many contexts, so x86_64 should not use it without extra care
> > from interrupt context, let alone NMI context.
> >
> > This will allow x86_64 to override the logic and will supply some
> > scratch space to use to make a cleaner copy of user regs.
>
> Just wondering how bad it would be to fill out the actual pt_regs that
> was previously partially initialized?

Bad, for at least two reasons.

One is that we don't actually know which regs are initialized.  bx,
bp, r12 etc are particularly bad in this regard, due to the FORK_LIKE
mechanism and similar optimizations.

The other is that the uninitialized part of task_pt_regs can be used
for something else entirely.  If we have a syscall instruction
immediately followed by a regular interrupt, then the interrupt's
hardware frame will overlap task_pt_regs.  (I'm not going to claim
that this design is sensible, but it is what it is.  IIRC Denys
Vlasenko had some patches to partially clean this up.)

It would be possible to rework the code to avoid an extra pt_regs
copy, but I don't see an obvious way to do it cleanly.

--Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-05 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-23  6:22 [PATCH] perf core: Use KSTK_ESP() instead of pt_regs->sp while output user regs root
2014-12-23  8:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found] ` <c027bde0-5f4f-441f-8d45-3e7f6f702231@alibaba-inc.com>
2014-12-25 15:48   ` 答复:[PATCH] " Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-25 16:21     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-30 19:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-30 23:29       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-31  2:00         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-02 16:11           ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-02 18:03             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-05  8:47               ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-04 16:10       ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-04 17:18         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-04 17:41           ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-04 18:36             ` [PATCH 0/2] perf: Improve user regs sampling Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-04 18:36               ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Move task_pt_regs sampling into arch code Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-05 14:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-05 16:13                   ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2015-01-05 16:44                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-05 18:28                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 12:32                 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-04 18:36               ` [PATCH 2/2] x86_64, perf: Improve user regs sampling Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 12:32                 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86_64: " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-05 10:46               ` [PATCH 0/2] perf: " Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrW6cv_s60uzi_scy5JBdr4+wrz1O5we-3okc-SZKRVofA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenggang.qcg@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=chenggang.qcg@taobao.com \
    --cc=chenggang.qin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Move task_pt_regs sampling into arch code' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.