All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/entry: add unwind hint annotations
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:50:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWJeNXiEPPVecc2OGRENj220zNeFCYgm+Q2P7ZiMvoVFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629175333.bicpvbwo4d5pdbak@treble>

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> There's a bug here that will need a small change to the entry code.
>
> Mike Galbraith reported:
>
>   WARNING: can't dereference registers at ffffc900089d7e08 for ip ffffffff81740bbb
>
> After some looking I found that it's caused by the following code
> snippet in the 'interrupt' macro in entry_64.S:
>
>         /*
>          * Save previous stack pointer, optionally switch to interrupt stack.
>          * irq_count is used to check if a CPU is already on an interrupt stack
>          * or not. While this is essentially redundant with preempt_count it is
>          * a little cheaper to use a separate counter in the PDA (short of
>          * moving irq_enter into assembly, which would be too much work)
>          */
>         movq    %rsp, %rdi
>         incl    PER_CPU_VAR(irq_count)
>         cmovzq  PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr), %rsp
>         UNWIND_HINT_REGS base=rdi
>         pushq   %rdi
>         UNWIND_HINT_REGS indirect=1
>
> The problem is that it's changing the stack pointer *before* writing the
> previous stack pointer (push %rdi).  So when unwinding from an NMI which
> hit between the rsp write and the rdi push, the unwinder tries to access
> the regs on the previous stack (by reading rdi), but the previous stack
> pointer isn't there yet, so the access is considered out of bounds.

Ugh, that code.  Does this problem go away with this patch applied:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/entry_ist&id=2231ec7e0bcc1a2bc94a17081511ab54cc6badd1

If so, want to update the patch for new kernels (shouldn't conflict
with anything except your unwind hints)?

--Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-28 15:11 [PATCH v2 0/8] x86: undwarf unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] objtool: move checking code to check.c Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 13:12   ` [tip:core/objtool] objtool: Move " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] objtool, x86: add several functions and files to the objtool whitelist Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 13:12   ` [tip:core/objtool] objtool, x86: Add " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] objtool: stack validation 2.0 Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30  8:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-30 13:23     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 13:26       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 14:09     ` [PATCH] objtool: silence warnings for functions which use iret Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 17:49       ` [tip:core/objtool] objtool: Silence warnings for functions which use IRET tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 13:13   ` [tip:core/objtool] objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0 tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] objtool: add undwarf debuginfo generation Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29  7:14   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-29 13:40     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29  7:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-29 14:04     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29 14:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-29 15:06         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-07-06 20:36           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-07-07  9:44             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-11  2:58               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-07-11  8:40                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] objtool, x86: add facility for asm code to provide unwind hints Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/entry: add unwind hint annotations Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29 17:53   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29 18:50     ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-06-29 19:05       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29 21:09         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-29 21:41           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29 22:59             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-30  2:12               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30  5:05                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-30  5:41                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-30 13:11                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 15:44                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-30 15:55                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-30 15:56                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-30 16:16                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] x86/asm: add unwind hint annotations to sync_core() Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] x86/unwind: add undwarf unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29  7:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] x86: " Ingo Molnar
2017-06-29 14:12   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-29 19:13     ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrWJeNXiEPPVecc2OGRENj220zNeFCYgm+Q2P7ZiMvoVFg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.