From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754333AbbBZTiY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:38:24 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:34119 "EHLO mail-lb0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753551AbbBZTiX (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:38:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150226193200.GA17709@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20150223181553.GE25477@ubuntumail> <20150224051928.GA14755@mail.hallyn.com> <20150224154715.GA20682@mail.hallyn.com> <20150224164429.GB29685@ubuntumail> <20150225033247.GC29685@ubuntumail> <20150226153524.GC15182@mail.hallyn.com> <20150226193200.GA17709@mail.hallyn.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:38:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1 To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Christoph Lameter , Serge Hallyn , Serge Hallyn , Aaron Jones , "Ted Ts'o" , LSM List , Andrew Morton , "Andrew G. Morgan" , Mimi Zohar , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Markku Savela , Jarkko Sakkinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux API , Michael Kerrisk , Jonathan Corbet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:28:30PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> >> > > Well doing that breaks su. >> > >> > Don't what exactly? You're saying that doing >> > >> > pI' = pI >> > pA' = pA (pA is ambient) >> > pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA)) >> > pE' = pP' & (fE | pA) >> > >> > stopped su from having CAP_SETGID while >> > >> > pI' = pI >> > pA' = pA (pA is ambient) >> > pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA)) >> > pE' = pP' & fE >> > >> > worked? I'll hope you're saying both "fail", in which case >> >> fE does not exist in cpu_vfs_cap_data. We only get fI and fP. Why in the >> world does setcap allow setting fE? > > It sets a bit in the magic_etc. So fE is either all on or all off. > >> V1 does not use fE. In my newer attempt, I seemed to have worked >> with zeroed field that I assumed was filled in. >> >> I will just do >> >> pE' = pP' >> >> Ok? > > Andrew Morgan was against that. What if we changed > > pE' = pP' & (fE | pA) > > to > > if (pA) > pE' = pP' & fE > else > pE' = pP' > Is this backwards? Also, on further bikeshedding consideration, I think I like the name "persistent" much better than "ambient". Alas, "persistent" starts with a P. --Andy