From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750959AbaFJEEi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:04:38 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]:54791 "EHLO mail-vc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750872AbaFJEEh (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:04:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140610025715.GA24314@kroah.com> References: <1401332999-15167-1-git-send-email-eparis@redhat.com> <20140609223057.GB18475@kroah.com> <20140609224645.GA8113@kroah.com> <20140610003142.GA20728@kroah.com> <20140610025715.GA24314@kroah.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:04:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking To: Greg KH Cc: Josh Boyer , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "security@kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:51:37PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> [cc list trimmed, security@ added] >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> >> > >> >> > But yes, having something "real" might be good if the load gets higher, >> >> > right now it's so low that my "sweep pending security patches" task >> >> > usually catches anything pending, which is rare. >> >> >> >> How does one get added to the security@ alias? We've been carrying >> >> this patch in Fedora for a bit now. I'd be happy to help track things >> >> given we get distro security bug reports and such. >> > >> > Just ask on the security@ alias to be added and we can take it from >> > there. >> > >> >> Would it make sense for there to be someone on the security list who >> can assign CVE numbers? > > I'm pretty sure we have that already. Let me rephrase the question: Would it make sense for someone on the security list to assign CVE numbers? --Andy