From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754656AbbERT2v (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:51 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]:34416 "EHLO mail-la0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754145AbbERT2s (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 15:28:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20150428181203.35812.60474.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150428182417.35812.92834.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:28:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2 01/20] e820, efi: add ACPI 6.0 persistent memory types To: Dan Williams Cc: Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jens Axboe , linux-nvdimm , Jeff Moyer , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On May 16, 2015 12:48 AM, "Dan Williams" wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > Dan Williams writes: > > > >> @@ -919,10 +920,31 @@ static inline const char *e820_type_to_string(int e820_type) > >> case E820_NVS: return "ACPI Non-volatile Storage"; > >> case E820_UNUSABLE: return "Unusable memory"; > >> case E820_PRAM: return "Persistent RAM"; > >> + case E820_PMEM: return "Persistent I/O Memory"; > > > > Minor nit, but nobody refers to this stuff as persistent I/O memory. > > I've heard it referred to as persistent memory or storage class memory. > > In the end, I doubt it matters. > > Had we not polluted the waters with E820_PRAM I would have chosen > "Persistent Memory", but as we now need to support both I'd assume > they need different names. We could reverse it and call E820_PRAM "legacy persistent RAM" or something similar. > > > Acked-by: Jeff Moyer > > Thanks Jeff.