From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ED6C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54C620872 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552939490; bh=VxP+vAro5vjl+5TW9HBLtbTDE0dvcAVdcTwI/Q3IDxM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=N9oGNJKmsIeRiyuBGeN524rH2yk3hKPnH60ZlAltRommi4D6q1S2KBkpqzp4mQiIE oCMEnk4+xbk7OQnamPagHcPK3NLHeqytMJ7+Q8gdCJVaMURIPSLHHfck/ruq1zeQm4 QhRxvgP2LiW4IUX0COFKCDE5Xx9L65AbqMev0GmM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727465AbfCRUEt (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:04:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59310 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726777AbfCRUEs (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:04:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com (mail-wm1-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98B3220872 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552939487; bh=VxP+vAro5vjl+5TW9HBLtbTDE0dvcAVdcTwI/Q3IDxM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=PEEzjXBm5j7nwSw8JM/ldmfCzcpFT57siPdMTtdbY84MtjoMZrkjHx7uokqMPyOZO Kt2TLhfmS2ozwEo0jMayZRnmZNluZ2MzjgZ0YkWUGtHs/v6VK3hGQfs3Pd6SGNZPEj zL5vnk5URz0RvElmW65iL20fcHGi4MYCMOU1AU5U= Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id z11so5863627wmi.0 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVgJDKYpmP+T/JQn6/hlvWGaJgfEHgmz0SUF0PIl2+Kn4GvaKVf J/QmHG2gesEemOYtLB6m84w+NjK1KHHus3KUIli+hg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0Qp0LaqRE7TDSGtKjrBxrV1SRYxrd9ZsByp+J6+nszeCFG/2GlsipIJinh1+fUEuFHdnHaG+CvXROayqeoko= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:eb14:: with SMTP id j20mr537361wmh.32.1552939486176; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:28 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ptrace: consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 To: Sudeep Holla Cc: X86 ML , linux-arm-kernel , LKML , linuxppc-dev , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Oleg Nesterov , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Richard Weinberger , Jeff Dike , Steve Capper , Haibo Xu , Bin Lu , Andy Lutomirski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:49 AM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi, > > This patchset evolved from the discussion in the thread[0][1]. When we > wanted to add PTRACE_SYSEMU support to ARM64, we thought instead of > duplicating what other architectures like x86 and powerpc have done, > let consolidate the existing support and move it to the core as there's > nothing arch specific in it. > In the discussion from the first version, there was talk of some testing. Can you put the test cases in question into v3? --Andy From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D99C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551F620989 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="e7d+6Fob" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 551F620989 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44NRym3GLWzDqP6 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:06:24 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=luto@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="e7d+6Fob"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44NRwz03WZzDqHw for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:04:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9A96217F4 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552939488; bh=VxP+vAro5vjl+5TW9HBLtbTDE0dvcAVdcTwI/Q3IDxM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=e7d+6Fob+r60jqntGxl0h2CUy/r3aqHdTZ76jqw4a/9SJn8mCMQ9CNRj8fLVhdDZ0 KhbnKl9+NrTxxbtHOuowKLNayd4qh/ZuLMvi6Xuh/uM0c3LPA0DJYThybTlEtdZEyM vezDSpreM/7fFZNIp+BhlHrcJU08bW/8Tt8PyjiM= Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 4so14307198wmf.5 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXj6mCvbah2ltJLrnERR2jUHRpmj7V8Ajmy2TtzyLWG323pLP07 O3sjv7nZLB2eRCFTdM0TO5N8bh6uh8FMF1vYr8Z2cQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0Qp0LaqRE7TDSGtKjrBxrV1SRYxrd9ZsByp+J6+nszeCFG/2GlsipIJinh1+fUEuFHdnHaG+CvXROayqeoko= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:eb14:: with SMTP id j20mr537361wmh.32.1552939486176; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:28 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ptrace: consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 To: Sudeep Holla Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Haibo Xu , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , Jeff Dike , X86 ML , Will Deacon , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Bin Lu , linuxppc-dev , linux-arm-kernel Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:49 AM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi, > > This patchset evolved from the discussion in the thread[0][1]. When we > wanted to add PTRACE_SYSEMU support to ARM64, we thought instead of > duplicating what other architectures like x86 and powerpc have done, > let consolidate the existing support and move it to the core as there's > nothing arch specific in it. > In the discussion from the first version, there was talk of some testing. Can you put the test cases in question into v3? --Andy From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA17C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB0E20872 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WZYueeeu"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PEEzjXBm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9CB0E20872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=bx/zkdZCjsykyLTlT2tLRKPOS8KILn4QK6/GK7gbcZg=; b=WZYueeeurNRSbb kfdNcF5w9NuufvaT0sQFGv4zn/48D6N9+RpMCGKINLlMh+03L5YdrNqKIWpXcP/W3NcYvMgEQmNS+ h2jNjo8s5Jtq5u/pJ/bPlh8sVji7wY957ogViTlbKi8lwW4OBK1fisIPUj0nF0V106J/pkJq/rLrw QZ+T4MZncIg5wuxCM+bBfKbQ7onz3VuPyM/4h65kHYykA4aSaz9POsw0rNyngFOliNIkfu70ocEkm KcuszRejj+QzzZgakB5aWABOeGF9cxSmnVNZxE+GJR1Q3DdWgvHy2WuX2/HtwWNJSA4yawHzeEhnd akVzZM1NbGTtUldxpxIA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h5yV8-0008FD-U0; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:50 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h5yV6-0008Er-RK for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:49 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A726B217D8 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552939487; bh=VxP+vAro5vjl+5TW9HBLtbTDE0dvcAVdcTwI/Q3IDxM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=PEEzjXBm5j7nwSw8JM/ldmfCzcpFT57siPdMTtdbY84MtjoMZrkjHx7uokqMPyOZO Kt2TLhfmS2ozwEo0jMayZRnmZNluZ2MzjgZ0YkWUGtHs/v6VK3hGQfs3Pd6SGNZPEj zL5vnk5URz0RvElmW65iL20fcHGi4MYCMOU1AU5U= Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id f3so14493974wmj.4 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVzoVQilqf9A7jwbMINFL84AbuMaPW8iUSbPbzFNxGbCZ6/ns6t z5US8EOFp6P2NxiK6TTBlq4KLqCwWcFrXBq5nBEnrw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0Qp0LaqRE7TDSGtKjrBxrV1SRYxrd9ZsByp+J6+nszeCFG/2GlsipIJinh1+fUEuFHdnHaG+CvXROayqeoko= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:eb14:: with SMTP id j20mr537361wmh.32.1552939486176; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:28 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ptrace: consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 To: Sudeep Holla X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190318_130448_905799_0949F444 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.44 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Haibo Xu , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , Jeff Dike , X86 ML , Will Deacon , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Andy Lutomirski , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , Bin Lu , linuxppc-dev , linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:49 AM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi, > > This patchset evolved from the discussion in the thread[0][1]. When we > wanted to add PTRACE_SYSEMU support to ARM64, we thought instead of > duplicating what other architectures like x86 and powerpc have done, > let consolidate the existing support and move it to the core as there's > nothing arch specific in it. > In the discussion from the first version, there was talk of some testing. Can you put the test cases in question into v3? --Andy _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel