All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rohan.puri15@gmail.com (rohan puri)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Hooking exec system call
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:04:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALJfu6N5jVqRev2aC9Vx-d8uau-aCLPQe3i03Q+et1oa1cOJXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7C4389.7070405@gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Abhijit Pawar <apawar.linux@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 09/23/2011 01:01 PM, Rajat Sharma wrote:
>
>> Untidy way : -
>>> Yes, you can do that by registering a new binary format handler. Whenever
>>> exec is called, a list of registered binary format handlers is scanned,
>>> in
>>> the same way you can hook the load_binary&  load_library function
>>> pointers
>>> of the already registered binary format handlers.
>>>
>> Challenge with this untidy way is to identify the correct format, for
>> example if you are interested in only hooking ELF format, there is no
>> special signature withing the registered format handler to identify
>> that, however if one format handler recognizes the file header, its
>> load_binary will return 0. This can give you the hint that you are
>> sitting on top of correct file format. Long time back I had written
>> the similar module in Linux to do the same, but can't share the code
>> :)
>>
>> -Rajat
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, rohan puri<rohan.puri15@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Abhijit Pawar<apawar.linux@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi list,
>>>> Is there any way to hook the exec system call on Linux box apart from
>>>> replacing the call in System Call table?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Abhijit Pawar
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
>>>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.**org <Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
>>>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.**org/mailman/listinfo/**kernelnewbies<http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies>
>>>>
>>> Tidy way : -
>>>
>>> You can do that from LSM (Linux security module).
>>>
>>> Untidy way : -
>>> Yes, you can do that by registering a new binary format handler. Whenever
>>> exec is called, a list of registered binary format handlers is scanned,
>>> in
>>> the same way you can hook the load_binary&  load_library function
>>> pointers
>>> of the already registered binary format handlers.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohan Puri
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
>>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.**org <Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
>>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.**org/mailman/listinfo/**kernelnewbies<http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies>
>>>
>>>
>>>  So If I use the binary format handler, then I can hook the exec call.
> however I need to register this. Does that mean that I need to return the
> negative value so as to have actual ELF handler to be loaded?
>
> Regards,
> Abhijit Pawar
>
> Read this, http://www.linux.it/~rubini/docs/binfmt/binfmt.html this might
help

Regards,
Rohan Puri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110923/e62f4990/attachment-0001.html 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-23  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-22  8:23 Hooking exec system call Abhijit Pawar
2011-09-22  8:50 ` Christophe Hauser
2011-09-22  9:44 ` rohan puri
2011-09-23  7:31   ` Rajat Sharma
2011-09-23  8:30     ` Abhijit Pawar
2011-09-23  8:34       ` rohan puri [this message]
2011-09-23  9:13         ` Abhijit Pawar
2011-09-23  9:41           ` rohan puri
2011-09-26  6:32             ` Abhijit Pawar
2011-09-26  6:56               ` rohan puri
2011-09-26  6:59                 ` Abhijit Pawar
2011-09-26  7:27                   ` rohan puri
2011-09-26  7:30                     ` Abhijit Pawar
2011-09-26  7:32                       ` rohan puri
2011-09-22 16:57 ` Mulyadi Santosa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALJfu6N5jVqRev2aC9Vx-d8uau-aCLPQe3i03Q+et1oa1cOJXQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rohan.puri15@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.