From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:37:34 +0300
Message-ID: <CALLzPKa=DuhmTZ7enLH6LNKA1mimC9OJZoaCJrprrHJwg=mRdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1315921427.git.dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
	<1316525069.3189.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<CALLzPKbPM-7Z4UphWvZUFxT9vF8XJSWyeUGTkLaM7--2A6y7eA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LRH.2.00.1109270914480.4126@tundra.namei.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Return-path: <linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1109270914480.4126@tundra.namei.org>
Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:15 AM, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
>
>> It seems nobody wants to share their thoughts about it?
>> Does this silence mean acceptance?
>> Should I prepare final patches for merge?
>
> Not yet.
>
> I'd like to hear what the crypto folk think about the crypto.
>
> --
> James Morris
> <jmorris@namei.org>
>

Herbert,

Can you say what you think?

Thank you,
Dmitry

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754899Ab1I1Phs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:37:48 -0400
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:9903 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752413Ab1I1Phq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:37:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1109270914480.4126@tundra.namei.org>
References: <cover.1315921427.git.dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
	<1316525069.3189.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<CALLzPKbPM-7Z4UphWvZUFxT9vF8XJSWyeUGTkLaM7--2A6y7eA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LRH.2.00.1109270914480.4126@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:37:34 +0300
Message-ID: <CALLzPKa=DuhmTZ7enLH6LNKA1mimC9OJZoaCJrprrHJwg=mRdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension
From: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
        linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:15 AM, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
>
>> It seems nobody wants to share their thoughts about it?
>> Does this silence mean acceptance?
>> Should I prepare final patches for merge?
>
> Not yet.
>
> I'd like to hear what the crypto folk think about the crypto.
>
> --
> James Morris
> <jmorris@namei.org>
>

Herbert,

Can you say what you think?

Thank you,
Dmitry