From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-f72.google.com (mail-ot1-f72.google.com [209.85.210.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6DE6B0389 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:25:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v4so6920514otb.0 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id v9sor11232812otb.161.2018.10.29.09.25.07 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:25:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20181026075900.111462-1-marcorr@google.com> From: Jim Mattson Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:25:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [kvm PATCH v4 0/2] use vmalloc to allocate vmx vcpus Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wanpeng Li Cc: Marc Orr , kvm , David Rientjes , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Paolo Bonzini , Radim Krcmar , willy@infradead.org, Sean Christopherson On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote: > We have not yet encounter memory is too fragmented to allocate kvm > related metadata in our overcommit pools, is this true requirement > from the product environments? Yes.