All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: call tcp_drop() in tcp collapse
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 15:42:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbAjtNf1LOhWEJMKNEEHSxjfEKiVV22KPUK88CTzt-eW0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKXPu=RKkLop4NJWZLixE__qYV2S=PngSj6ienuvWWL8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:35 PM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So what about LINUX_MIB_TCPOFOMERGE ?
>> Regarding LINUX_MIB_TCPOFOMERGE,  a skb is already covered by another
>> skb, is that dropping the packet or simply lowering the memory
>> overhead ?
>
> What do you think ?
>
> If you receive two times the same payload, don't you have to drop one
> of the duplicate ?
>
> There is a a big difference between the two cases.

If the drop caused some data lost (which may then cause retransmition
or something), then this is a really DROP.
While if the drop won't cause any data lost, meaning it is a
non-harmful behavior, I think it should not be defined as DROP.
This is my suggestion anyway.

Thanks
Yafang

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-28  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-28  3:01 [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: call tcp_drop() in tcp collapse Yafang Shao
2018-07-28  3:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: propagate GSO to the new skb built " Yafang Shao
2018-07-28  3:13   ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-28  3:22     ` Yafang Shao
2018-07-28  3:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: call tcp_drop() " Eric Dumazet
2018-07-28  3:34   ` Yafang Shao
2018-07-28  3:38     ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-28  7:42       ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2018-07-28 16:28         ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-30  2:06           ` Yafang Shao
2018-07-30  2:27             ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-30  5:40               ` Yafang Shao
2018-07-30 15:56                 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31  0:48                   ` Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALOAHbAjtNf1LOhWEJMKNEEHSxjfEKiVV22KPUK88CTzt-eW0w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.