From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]:64881 "EHLO mail-oa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755868AbaFSHnh (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 03:43:37 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n16so4390027oag.34 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:43:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140618230516.GZ1903@suse.cz> References: <5398D475.4070309@redhat.com> <5398D4DF.9080508@redhat.com> <20140612105151.GN1903@twin.jikos.cz> <5399BB92.2070205@redhat.com> <20140618152906.GW1903@twin.jikos.cz> <20140618230516.GZ1903@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] btrfs-progs: add mount options to btrfs-mount.5 From: WorMzy Tykashi To: dsterba@suse.cz, WorMzy Tykashi , Eric Sandeen , linux-btrfs , Karel Zak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 19 June 2014 00:05, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:59:50PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: >> I think you forgot to apply the patch that adds >> Documentation/btrfs-mount.5.txt before you tagged >> integration-20140618, man5 (and consequently Documentation) can't be >> made without it, causing a failed build. > > You're right, sorry. The file was not added after a conflict with > git-am and I did not check afterwards. Local build test passed. > Updated integration pushed, though it's a bit reduced. The 'next' > sub-branch rebase had some suspicious glitch, I need to look closer > tomorrow. Thanks for the fast update. :) Good luck battling that glitch! Cheers, WorMzy