From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dbaryshkov@gmail.com (Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:50:48 +0400 Subject: [PATCH 07/15] pxa25x_udc: drop support for udc_command In-Reply-To: <20110708213428.GA31866@kroah.com> References: <1309871321-11305-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1309871321-11305-8-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <20110705134615.GJ2820@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20110708213428.GA31866@kroah.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 7/9/11, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality. >> > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code. >> >> looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on >> parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches >> straight ? Here's my Acked-by: >> >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer > instead. Why? I can understand if you'd say that it should go through the ARM/PXA trees, but why GPIO? -- With best wishes Dmitry