From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF799C433F5
	for <dpdk-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 May 2022 14:40:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B1B40DDD;
	Wed, 11 May 2022 16:40:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (mail-lf1-f50.google.com
 [209.85.167.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1417406B4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:40:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id d15so3970776lfk.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=semihalf-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=YSUKfh+Ni3QG/CuEqob3de9vDCLskb+CMhgKXhwuicI=;
 b=RLH3nOPw2YoVpVIhYVGsHFgbtmiCBG9YqsuaHCLaWm1NtDeEMJeA9Vvh6N7M60FOL+
 puBjsuCkwUqSRCRLdqG6PFjBA+cuQ4yQesnGRjdxwKLHdaxj+ywaBre0PS8pJwOBKIzB
 PueU7zPKVHBymM7/pmv5uHeN1HDX5GBLeLIBovlXsXnEPrf19Y8zjC0Daj/NoFZKTIsd
 /FscOr6nm4P9xT7v5Fgco5n7parKQH5aleaqG2vXMLg1RP83YF1F635iL5AbrTfL/5j+
 xfeKC+KA0jOdAPrTWpAzosNcosm+cQHgKw4OUJP8DNsvhlEpKPH846WD9YeP3mKej/ov
 RQEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=YSUKfh+Ni3QG/CuEqob3de9vDCLskb+CMhgKXhwuicI=;
 b=A9HxW5An6EZl050TkTqaTwXROQ3Ms4AExQzU1AdHXQzEACJEMwx8QnxDGbYvzjuJYy
 EFpgmmYb+Xp05mSNeMeqMZGfXd3gfm7nR0Rer9+KLcyPFpe11XdGBOds+Knb/NP7BecU
 DS7R/1fE4qY+1gOIvGWN5iLra7wZ3ROdgOupbGTerFlLd9FFuazP4VIyRIVn+r9PeBAU
 ASaoul+bWWYrdMwdWnBvpMggGMvD4/IljY2CY32UH66x3ntEBzdr0N9QSZLTY4AcJUuH
 KiQfuPJAEkqC1DZTtIuVvbyj1LCy0LH2sPrm5q75a3J/q0liEF6MwRc+XTrWnxR0s/Ty
 hvOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Dd6Nfs3scpvQLZXnICW++MhY6u+l/fGXZSpl/jVLcmmGWa0bD
 ZqAMu5lZfZoAc1y3b+BvillK7NJrrJBCWyOday1c/A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxET7DkPUp1MzX5HTdjIHld/ljxQv033nGTBFtaXtLuX36wDrHTilFBtxoscZbc8QYdmGxtkWHJDAbrBY/uS0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:ace:b0:473:b1fb:6c2e with SMTP id
 n14-20020a0565120ace00b00473b1fb6c2emr20547305lfu.394.1652280033429; Wed, 11
 May 2022 07:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220510115758.457794-1-kda@semihalf.com>
 <DBAPR08MB5814A2D32DA177C1BE4FCDD798C99@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR08MB5814A2D32DA177C1BE4FCDD798C99@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw_Kardach?= <kda@semihalf.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:39:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CALVGJWL69WvKAPxpjwSz_ug04F1jSt-oPLGBCHNOTHLDHnKngg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] test/ring: remove excessive inlining
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Frank Zhao <Frank.Zhao@starfivetech.com>, 
 Sam Grove <sam.grove@sifive.com>, "mw@semihalf.com" <mw@semihalf.com>, 
 "upstream@semihalf.com" <upstream@semihalf.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, 
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, 
 "bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, 
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:24 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
<Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Is there a bug report created for this? Is it possible to add a link to the bug report?
I have found a bug for a similar issue (with "if" conditional):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93062
I'll add it in v2.