From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D466C4727D for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EF9206DB for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:02:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600891354; bh=Hfj5AJiotfbwQi0kMDqrpWXz9xdg2XtkK2YtPtockBI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=M306407OOtTOfSE1K5ecNLfRF2pAzCmSLGVkev45xFaw5B47e8n/wCJvyN2xd88Fg RcOETpFcZ9enZaPKewTRdNxo6mQjc7OrorTDHfrkG98IphV2RXJE8asueklY79H0Nz LvmYblAhr4i1jG7dh8mvFEphZnpBa/3yhsAQMHiE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726545AbgIWUCd (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:02:33 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47670 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726381AbgIWUCd (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:02:33 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-f48.google.com (mail-oo1-f48.google.com [209.85.161.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 293B82376F; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:02:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600891352; bh=Hfj5AJiotfbwQi0kMDqrpWXz9xdg2XtkK2YtPtockBI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=CPA4TVx3vS+R9PSYZ9Rg/4PQOffM91B88SzaKWnMX5Z+YAxruNqYhgk+vsf5tEdIC 6oKkIgfvpUbMfE5L1ns80Y2fRE+EAtRw5wvzRI9iUC2TWxyIheG92n7xazGiXS6bCP PipsE8pts773ENz+lGaKyitmINzT6D+W4CCPiRdw= Received: by mail-oo1-f48.google.com with SMTP id r10so187118oor.5; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310UVJH9e4vAj0t8WiTdpCV+yGpq51ci+68ebSQLWBX7dGdFFl7 Tr8OfWtfkVMM+zcJNLBMCbG2HRCac77oUnaYKA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyo8orKX4m2ejKI3lDZOCiQVidclBviAUSxjSDNv9CpOD2NSnth0Z9GiZENKPHCTtwCRcB3aPJwDChQhgeOYXs= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d306:: with SMTP id g6mr948766oos.25.1600891351344; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:02:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200916104135.25085-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <20200916104135.25085-6-stephan@gerhold.net> <20200923153548.GA789614@bogus> <20200923155018.GA87584@gerhold.net> In-Reply-To: <20200923155018.GA87584@gerhold.net> From: Rob Herring Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:02:19 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,q6v5: Deprecate regulators for PDs To: Stephan Gerhold Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Rajendra Nayak , linux-arm-msm , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM" , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 9:51 AM Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:35:48AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:41:30PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > Newer platforms vote for necessary power domains through the power > > > domain subsystem. For historical reasons older platforms like MSM8916 > > > or MSM8974 still control these as regulators. > > > > Do you plan to change these platforms? If not then I wouldn't really > > call this deprecated. > > > > Yes, MSM8916 is changed as part of this patch series. > > It should also be done for MSM8974, but because I don't have any test > devices with it I'm not able to do it myself. > > Actually the old binding likely works only because of other side effects > (other drivers voting for the same resources), so I personally I would > definitely call it deprecated. Okay. Reviewed-by: Rob Herring