From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.2004.1589310472171578311 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:07:52 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=O5+/RvQA; spf=pass (domain: kernel.org, ip: 198.145.29.99, mailfrom: robh@kernel.org) Received: from mail-oi1-f179.google.com (mail-oi1-f179.google.com [209.85.167.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 930AA206A5; Tue, 12 May 2020 19:07:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589310471; bh=IyF4wilAL9ywX8M+HZ1DjEfK50DTmlOkEoPNrzyBl2E=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=O5+/RvQA4gjLt4vj/hiZcwWOSNWxmIcV1vZlw2KYPZ8zVPzY2UJF13LoBKnV4ldcU ohOh3FyWkpG8NwWDFh+aKoDaO9O9zx5qejWDK3YwfR6CIpVPZ13OoK3iGP93hPGY/U SIdMX673CNScDr7hPXUK/hz9xSEYhXvO8plET+/k= Received: by mail-oi1-f179.google.com with SMTP id v128so2387573oia.7; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuakyUHj+CR77x2SSH7jlEuXNbB298bNIxNA5gWoVlQvwYJ2ImDu q1ySODR0zPPWA45xCZ2KzP7xDvWOMNALjf4IXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKkeR69xgAt4qOkbkBuL0X19PnfAj8KUmdY3rOyj+BfwiUK4yDUq73N+tXbXCLV0b8o6KeGcWVObJ2lIWrBwGs= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1904:: with SMTP id l4mr24999916oii.106.1589310470873; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200424170442.ad3b3j5f5vkbcmvb@chatter.i7.local> <20200507202001.3sststasmemmgr5z@chatter.i7.local> In-Reply-To: <20200507202001.3sststasmemmgr5z@chatter.i7.local> From: "Rob Herring" Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 14:07:39 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] b4 v0.4.0 available with new features To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:20 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:23:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > I found a minor issue on patches with no 'To' header. They end up with > > this: > > > > To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <; > > > > However, that appears to be a public-inbox problem as it's on there > > too. Here's an example[1]. > > Interesting. I'm not seeing any strange output from that series. "b4 am" > and "b4 ty" seem to be generating proper things. Yes, 'b4 am' is correct, but 'b4 mbox' is not. That's with 0.4.2. Rob