From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B01C43334 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708432082B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="xNv40b/d" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 708432082B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727550AbeIDSqg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:46:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57148 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727072AbeIDSqg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:46:36 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com (mail-qt0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20BD72082B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:21:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1536070878; bh=egXClixNkXKPw1GXz6mDwrl4B18HWS/0Br1i1ngbMk4=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=xNv40b/doENfTNrKe9+UNZiAPTDBUXdEjROgn1lu1SRgW8lpQXHnhbWdMh2QCJ3N3 sxXLO4LQqH0kpE+uhtVCJXDCqU3UxIqLO6CXX0X+qjJnt+Je3ZOq1WhX87RdfsGLXP N6VS+hn2pyDVyRrrPCF5gaAwI7OiPNy9Jr2Eoy8c= Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g53-v6so4099076qtg.10 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 07:21:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AJLjmuoaMzYk0+FQuH5sxw9yopb8iIu/kBDTZMlZZaCKqJKw5x A9gRZSKRQahtAVHCm8E3aQ3OY81ix4qR2U9zIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYGJgzieXVpkIekAqfYN1TzIjjaZQdAONX3o2oSrW44cQT6zdzHschp16jYo70fViYyEU0A8LS5PSIUCkaiGpI= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7a98:: with SMTP id x24-v6mr30445622qtr.298.1536070877311; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 07:21:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180828015252.28511-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180828015252.28511-39-robh@kernel.org> <9dcceda0-1d92-0a7a-feb1-887414021ac9@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <9dcceda0-1d92-0a7a-feb1-887414021ac9@ti.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:21:05 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:24 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Tuesday 28 August 2018 07:22 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, > > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. > > I assume it should be okay to get this merged in the next merge window? Yes, of course. Rob From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:21:05 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] phy: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name In-Reply-To: <9dcceda0-1d92-0a7a-feb1-887414021ac9@ti.com> References: <20180828015252.28511-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180828015252.28511-39-robh@kernel.org> <9dcceda0-1d92-0a7a-feb1-887414021ac9@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:24 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Tuesday 28 August 2018 07:22 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, > > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. > > I assume it should be okay to get this merged in the next merge window? Yes, of course. Rob