From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9A6F7E0083C; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:58:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (schnitzeltony[at]googlemail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.217.172 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.217.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-ua0-f172.google.com (mail-ua0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DB5E00777 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-f172.google.com with SMTP id h2so49478962uaa.1 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:58:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JQiMYFpZ2q7BrKGac3Uk/tcXSNhllnfobLGSxfdLEBQ=; b=Rg0i1ve/ik3FewfcP2KoLUbg8u5YxUbBYNNLa7PaYkzCQPy51T4mhk77oLkxosyxeY ysr4PZythoXwZ16qYu2MaJgL+jdtdhvOGataBcfhhYhrxATFr36S3hI/KMyiOWZqP+lw UFWFrvUJa43yowMWlRhO8FVQRxMncvUz3iyehg6y0y0XLpGA2/qnqROFUxWrTwEhH2x6 N47ErTpR7GTUKYSQ6beJEofnRglEbFXRiaOhSRy/OfzqpnlpyVCMHTyB50W+PiSNU8rn IMnPTt0NsFEmhw200I5B12rvWp0YHCC9OxMJT7Cj4vcM9GQS9rMKE/nJJk+m/DL+WTfE mkyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JQiMYFpZ2q7BrKGac3Uk/tcXSNhllnfobLGSxfdLEBQ=; b=KLv0oitJK6XWKmTl1arUAhVHNJyUKWMEr3vaaju8tqvergiHoc8e9lLgU83MHRO8NS TB5/LQpFZZUnKuxyn/wl2oYVfY2sowppkZdxaR7c+Bmcy27lg0V7jS/l4s9nYfxOhXvH mlw0rVGC24WrtTY5eDd1a+8H7f/gmMHakh+QPLhLUZA8PGdUdiXq67ChhxB33ujyr3/M HI5tVoes8vFPqGlnDHyb/9abFMXiRXLlchGm2l0gXUkecxBUapeqlh2RC9BtXCx2oOFp u7dBpH/yqcR9KdYZXBkF7QVX0vOk8G3jUk0t18hJ9uoAiWz6hqNn8chd+Zz20CjjZZqW 4yhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5Ym0+2Eux+EnxBC2/QKHaOeGHSgB72OSovRtUZt0LTt7BLUB2O TKYARGSZlOJ/bkAsV/4KZBsetftShg== X-Received: by 10.176.25.18 with SMTP id v18mr3529709uag.81.1492693129831; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:58:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.81.5 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:58:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <007c01d2b9cd$27706fc0$76514f40$@neuf.fr> References: <20170415133928.GA29433@linux-uys3> <20170415163537.GA23175@linux-uys3> <005c01d2b988$0b2c9e50$2185daf0$@neuf.fr> <20170420071321.GA25443@linux-uys3> <007c01d2b9cd$27706fc0$76514f40$@neuf.fr> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_M=C3=BCller?= Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:58:49 +0200 Message-ID: To: Herve Jourdain Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] gles2 on raspi3 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:58:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Herve Jourdain wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > I agree with you that VC4 is easier to work with - and can be patched if there are issues. > But normally you lose the H.264 and MPEG2 HW decoders, and a bunch of audio codecs, provided by the userland/omx. > Depending on what you're doing, you may or may not notice the difference. But I'm not sure how well you can handle 1080p30 or 1080p60 in H.264 using only ffmpeg - if you're using chromium, that's what you should be using I guess. > My personal preference would be to use VC4, and that's what I do most of the time, but there is still a limitation for the moment, that I just wanted to point out. > And that's why I think we can't do only VC4, and probably have to keep userland a while longer. Thanks for clarification - and I agree with you. For me it is not a use case but others have different needs. Andreas