From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A6697E008E0; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 06:39:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (schnitzeltony[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.218.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com (mail-oi0-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1518CE00718 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id y207-v6so6659921oie.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BEGo1fAau/TBI1ICPaPRfNhEJXFokoXdVuJuyTq9jK4=; b=r1bWkSsrCEWtejHXm2TXZTRmzyDrk9PnzLSTIT24VLXjj8RrrNKTrw8c6ZZlJ22utA mLUDDHAndUxom0cK8J9iKVITFRUOHfb2c0siU59rlBO4/CZBgJdasDU6nnPWs9QtFEB+ fsLi5BfWJSLaqP8++9+2YLmXDcbj3qjpgpvNcqV0H7adw6pYjIYWZDwiRcREqI7aWIa4 NZpATO4mQDf2k5SpM/mWvHNbGr7RC0JpUPKX33UFDf2PD39ppNW+igCyNQUezmfrBPRG cVg0Na0cnqEOX8m4eGGQq2a4GWDhOiTRDQrBXWiFMRdvZG2mXpYLnAI3qC59GLP9EepR 3xtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BEGo1fAau/TBI1ICPaPRfNhEJXFokoXdVuJuyTq9jK4=; b=ji/GNZRsKakKPtEnsWPj8n/Gnd0WthAwVTSdWCmJhN1pLvu6F0i4Py7Gd/IkK/fc1T LbLkHAevtRRF/atU2tTYRA64+lDHmJHZx0zhRyFKI00JakMC2Anlni49FDR4UiXAlN2n msO8KpHjzjmVsKYvinuLuV9OybPqGsuJa+3fwEdk121GyrNnIpG3rmXcpk+FG4U/wjw8 GXTNJS1tgMc/5Nf3ZKWjOtjYXYjAl+SSrAc8oxodp32mWPPCkp6SMTPcm+52RjhP1lAB NQKy0+v3mAzfECgJqzJctvmJRB28XseqCH9QtuiIMrezVQhrkOYLOB5OTbo4ekJvyvyE fb1A== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51C5uGAXgq/Z08VMpezWX5RwNRDHu0blLicxtG/cTIhFvog8VE1n YsD1nmpjFbznXyfrYE/ic8AzbDoWaG+9Sr0PmfQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaWbhLaDkCnnLRkyqH4K3JfyKu6mZA34bIEEaBxGO8pMwoNPiRocPTYicZZVS7/x6XMwQLIJ9POw8ZerTfdpLs= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4f44:: with SMTP id d65-v6mr26348299oib.224.1536068391724; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 06:39:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac9:4909:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 06:39:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20180828074303.23507-1-schnitzeltony@gmail.com> <20180828074303.23507-4-schnitzeltony@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_M=C3=BCller?= Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:39:51 +0200 Message-ID: To: Otavio Salvador Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Fix menuconfig for our kernels X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 13:39:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:35 AM Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Otavio Salvador >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:45 AM Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: >> >> >> >> * See discussion at [1] >> >> * Tested for linux-fslc >> >> >> >> [1] http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-Ap= ril/149912.html >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas M=C3=BCller >> > >> > It is possible to include this in our Linux fork? it avoids the need >> > of applying it on multiple kernels as patch. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> Yes - that might help for the derived kernels in >> meta-freescale-3rdparty in the long term. Can you give me hints where >> to send the patch for both kernels fslc/frrescale? > > Send it as a PR to our linux-fslc fork against the desired branch. Hi Otavio, * done for 4.17 [1] * wanted to do same for 4.18 but there were changes meanwhile. So patch does not apply and worst I have not time to tests. Let't postpone 4.18 until it is in mata-freescale - maybe it works fine then. [1] https://github.com/Freescale/linux-fslc/pull/30 Andreas