From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-f194.google.com (mail-il1-f194.google.com [209.85.166.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765757CDE4 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x5so24298959ila.6 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 03:29:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3VkL+IEH8qcEEHUTneqjg+7Z435FBLHPye7l+cqlTho=; b=sSH+LFmnfb5Udqz8IF14/gLSqtkBdg1+0wT76Jg7BC/mayTxtrWEzsofECdwwi96Kv C0oL9/V0GAIyLCPG7ro+yJACJIgBRcViodYGz39APwIVGdSDbCUAgjuSlVBtc9uv2YX/ d0Am0TulgkwxaMt3lP26K4bs6TIX+yYaCkwRABgyeWeq4pVe2+mrsSqtuGwW+7s7HJP4 mAb9UfyXOH+GQhglr3fKsdu/9QuezPBTWfug81w3Lo8pMTBLFYp5ISMEn2Fdu+lHzKxg N594eKKeczlH9MTVscQ+le6IXBqgxBFIFyYQXNdBUOEc7hob6COoSXipPMzzE6wICAz3 eQpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3VkL+IEH8qcEEHUTneqjg+7Z435FBLHPye7l+cqlTho=; b=pnu2KfIlb7UThHG6mDB+mWG6Pc619bSYGGbzfFUowC0Ka2OwxzlVI6+V/cxlIUX6Lh j4qvU6yaZh+xaQsh58ip/nBbxctevwdFAsHzxN3sEMgHhSi5foubuoFikqBzUwd6mKy1 gGCAzhrV5dLx/y5rZWdal2ctOzHl6JyLSOVc/+3ES8q85PsTZ7WYktWfJjPRFXyAqxFA cYgtbDK9XMC0dz3mngtqvR6eg0a6p5mUQ/CIGQDSmcXiYZ7p9LdAS93F37PQG4cgKXrs g9dMYNUmmCT/J88drzdlDIrL9RRcF547qa5RDs2QqIG1jo9ObWKqPmceAQMJVYODLdQI FqxA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUa0nueaQUDwnxZKDGxgaKAViyqcQurvB33nynjnHcz2rsXMULP f+G/w4gLssi5UkIyi0p7d/m1cnaK3raBIXnFRMY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxSwDLzByLCCoULqXw50RfYGVhKkBSCI76ukhPDfXKsFu9r1JnS+WzLJVMnHUJ2l8+3OZf1RD68ljdoiiohM4= X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb09:: with SMTP id s9mr51480432ilo.224.1577532578558; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 03:29:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191227213120.3930-1-schnitzeltony@gmail.com> <20191227213120.3930-9-schnitzeltony@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_M=C3=BCller?= Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:29:27 +0100 Message-ID: To: Khem Raj Cc: openembeded-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/23] evolution-data-server: upgrade 3.34.1 -> 3.34.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:29:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 4:22 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 3:48 PM Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 12:19 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > I think version specific information should be in bb file not inc > > we have a native build and it just builds some tools required. Both > > native/target share same version which is set in > > evolution-data-server.inc. So maybe I missed something but what kind > > of change do you suggest? > > > > hmm if it shares with native/nativesdk that might be fine > why dont we use bbclassextend for the native version ? > * Native and target recipes do not share much in common (see evolution-data-server.inc): As said: Native recipe just builds few necessary tools with a set of dependencies reduced to minimum. * Most pieces would require a specific entry (DEPENDS/do_configure/do_compile/do_install/RDEPENDS) for native and target. Since target recipe is already more complex than most recipes, extending to native would confuse more and cause recipe less readable. * There is no nativesdk yet. If someone needs it: extending target recipe should do. * This discussion is unrelated to this patch - right? Andreas