From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SySZ6-00082n-E9 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:08 +0200 Received: by yenm12 with SMTP id m12so1040829yen.6 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:50:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hbvur9yew6AS99TAaxu15gxSBPeF1KgjkSlT/h+MgyY=; b=JHsx3eBm1z19XmXOTHvxwtEI7EEKATzuFxdFEzNklyKVLYmxykwQPh8+FWgf5TkwZ2 gbHELGRmhythiBA6oCBXgRhlxtgiBSpFoBg7eJJiAE+TSCJigsRQI8wqMh6xp3b3B3XQ N5pUigLtcMi8yi794zk8vlDWpw7cwHWrwj2nf/9h4c8kS+o3ZlnZ+Qv2LTdYS+fgWu6C UW8FZm2J0yKbLDKS0clsSMsvA3GnUgdaXCnFqoFs9lRQxQd8+Yvmf4h0vguSmdNUFt8A DeVQWr/g3PeZcGfeoVCsQtrALsIqEg4YwgCYSvXjNkV+KsAitb1vlwTdGGuMUKsOe5w0 5D4Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.156.201 with SMTP id wg9mr6409319igb.45.1344279022720; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.142.201 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:50:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <501F8BEC.4080204@intel.com> References: <501CD3EE.3080100@intel.com> <501D2B2B.6070806@intel.com> <3103BB42-D7DD-456B-8733-9A019CA66E99@dominion.thruhere.net> <501EA63F.9090304@intel.com> <501F76BF.9000605@intel.com> <501F8BEC.4080204@intel.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 20:50:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_M=FCller?= To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gtk-icon-cache: call postinst scriplet at do_rootfs time X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:02:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > > > On 08/06/2012 11:10 AM, Andreas M=FCller wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Laurentiu Palcu >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 08/06/2012 01:49 AM, Andreas M=FCller wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andreas M=FCller >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Laurentiu Palcu >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> You could give it a test yourselves and let me know your results. I = will >>>>>> send a version 2 of the patchset(as soon as we all agree on the >>>>>> solution), with some changes suggested by Mark and some PR bumps >>>>>> suggested by Koen. >>>>> With the image I usually work with [1] and AMD Phenom II X6 1090 16GB >>>>> RAM I get a measurable delay - see attachment. I would not be happy >>>>> loosing latest do_rootfs enhancements (off topic - thanks for that). >>>>> Remeber we are only talking of gtk-update-icon-cache. OK I could buy >>>>> an intel host and work just with sato images but... >>> I suppose you could, but nobody asked you to do that, it's your choice >>> what's your build machine or what you'll be building for. >>> >>> Thanks for the measurements though. They do, indeed, show quite a >>> significant amount of time (around 6 minutes). A run-once solution is t= o >>> be considered in this case. >>> >>>>> >>>>> Andreas >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-misc/blobs/maste= r/recipes-image/xfce-full-image.bb >>>> OK I know it is not that important: The image created with this patch >>>> series creates tons of messages like >>> Why do you think is not important. Please elaborate. Or is it irony? >> Yes sorry - it was late night. > It's OK, let's work together and find the best solution for all of us. I > would also be pissed of if I had to wait an extra 6 minutes every > do_rootfs run. > >>> I don't think is in anybody's benefit if you take this approach. :) All >>> errors/warnings are important and they have to be taken care of. >>> >>>> >>>> xfdesktop:446): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module >>>> file '/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': No such file or >>>> directory >>>> >>>> and don't have icons at all. Did you run test that (on a hardware >>>> plattform different to your host)? >>> I only tested on qemu. And it worked just fine, without any errors. Wit= h >>> all icons in place. >> Which hardware did you emulate? My tests were done for overo (ARM >> cortext A8). I wonder if the created database is machine specific. > I used qemuarm. As far as I know, the database shouldn't be machine > specific. And, looking at the log you sent, it looks like all commands > succeeded. Otherwise, the 'time' application would also signal in the > log file if the command failed. Could please have a look, on your host > (xfce-full-image-1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/share/icons/hicolor or > xfce-full-image-1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/share/icons/gnome), to see if it > creates the icon-theme.cache files? It does for me and I don't > understand why it doesn't in your case... > > Thanks, > Laurentiu > I checked: In both I find the files icon-theme.cache. Andreas