From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0K2e-0000X2-M6; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:48:06 +0100 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so644992lah.6 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lLcDnPGMFLq3Oln2zETE+/gTLe/MCcyvWF5KuoE1/M4=; b=YHR/V57kUJNOfBzy1dt4FZveEmYzWm72hs4957M87X/xRgQUJnw1ECx023OzoGvlYB pOpk+/3eDKQp7Tey6Zy2GgJBoq0DdkKwr2ObyXcU7TZEijaBYT3THdwve5FO5v0R3oIn Yw2CsEcjzhvkCtxsh+nJA/YL4eiZfETTpHrWU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.145.137 with SMTP id su9mr20389614lab.23.1329946783778; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.108.164 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References:

Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:39:43 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_M=FCller?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] gcc-cross-initial patching fails X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:48:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > wrote: >>> Applying patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch >>> patching file gcc/config/alpha/elf.h >>> patching file gcc/config/ia64/linux.h >>> patching file gcc/config/linux.h >>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 89 (offset -12 lines). >>> patching file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 908. >>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >>> Patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch does not apply (enforce with -f) >>> ERROR: Function failed: patch_do_patch >>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: >>> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.5-r45+svnr181733/t= emp/log.do_patch.5367 >>> NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r45+svnr181733: task do_patch: Fail= ed >>> ERROR: Task 2829 >>> (/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes= -devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.bb, >>> do_patch) failed with exit code '1' >>> >>> git log does not help me much - =A0what goes wrong? >> >> Which actual patch is it failing on? Is there a conflict between >> oe-core and meta-oe patch set against gcc? > > gcc45-no-add-needed.patch is the patch in question. I dont see > anything wrong with it. > Can you do bitbake -ccleanall gcc-cross-initial and redo bitbake > gcc-cross-initial -cpatch ? > FYI: I removed the line which came in by the commits I mentioned above should_apply[vardepsexclude] +=3D "PN" in openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc and build from scratch works without issues. Andreas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0K2e-0000X2-M6; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:48:06 +0100 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so644992lah.6 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lLcDnPGMFLq3Oln2zETE+/gTLe/MCcyvWF5KuoE1/M4=; b=YHR/V57kUJNOfBzy1dt4FZveEmYzWm72hs4957M87X/xRgQUJnw1ECx023OzoGvlYB pOpk+/3eDKQp7Tey6Zy2GgJBoq0DdkKwr2ObyXcU7TZEijaBYT3THdwve5FO5v0R3oIn Yw2CsEcjzhvkCtxsh+nJA/YL4eiZfETTpHrWU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.145.137 with SMTP id su9mr20389614lab.23.1329946783778; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.108.164 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: