All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Drew Wareham <m3rlin@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:11:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALcU-6hxzE1Jjwcd=FQikReQCaPqrHN1FXdXim-kq1MvrwCgyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120415223106.GU6734@dastard>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3013 bytes --]

Hi Dave / Stan,

Thanks for taking the time to reply.  Unfortunately none of the suggestions
were able to recover the data - I'm going to rebuild the array now, but as
RAID6 for the extra level of security.

Thanks again for all your help!


Cheers,

Drew


On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:15:09PM +1000, Drew Wareham wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
> >
> > I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not
> > readable.  I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't
> access
> > any of the actual data.  A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has
> > rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
> >
> > Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
> >     [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
> >     Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >     [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> >     CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
> >     [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
> >     kmod-xfs.x86_64                            0.4-2
> > installed
> >     xfsdump.x86_64                             2.2.46-1.el5.centos
> > installed
> >     xfsprogs.x86_64                            2.9.4-1.el5.centos
>
> Try upgrading xfsprogs to the latest version first. this is rather
> old, and the latest versions handle IO errors better...
>
> > But even though the volume mounts, when trying to access data it just
> gives
> > a "Structure needs cleaning" error.
> >
> > Running xfs_check and xfs_repair yield the following:
> >     [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_check /dev/cciss/c0d2
> >     bad agf magic # 0x58418706 in ag 0
>
> Oh, that's bad. 2 bytes of the magic number are corrupt...
>
> >     bad agf version # 0x30002 in ag 0
>
> And the version is completely toast.
>
> >     /usr/sbin/xfs_check: line 28:  5259 Segmentation fault
> > xfs_db$DBOPTS -i -p xfs_check -c "check$OPTS" $1
> >     [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/cciss/c0d2
> >     Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> >     superblock read failed, offset 0, size 524288, ag 0, rval -1
> >
> >     fatal error -- Input/output error
> >
> > And they leave the following in dmesg:
> >     xfs_db[5259]: segfault at 000000000555a134 rip 00000000004070c3 rsp
> > 00007fff986bae50 error 4
> >     cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: c ffff810037e00000 has CHECK CONDITION
> sense
> > key = 0x3
>
> This is clearly a raid array error....
>
> ....
>
> > ................
> >     Filesystem cciss/c0d2: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line
> 2112
> > of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.  Caller 0xffffffff8835d9b9
> >
> > hpacucli says the array is fine, but it looks like it's corrupted to me.
>
> It's badly corrupted. Try a newer version of check/repair, otherwise
> you're in a disaster recovery situation...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3992 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-20  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-15 13:15 xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error Drew Wareham
2012-04-15 19:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-16 10:18   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-20  4:11   ` Drew Wareham [this message]
2012-04-20 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-20 15:46   ` Drew Wareham
2012-04-20 17:01     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-21  0:57       ` Drew Wareham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALcU-6hxzE1Jjwcd=FQikReQCaPqrHN1FXdXim-kq1MvrwCgyA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=m3rlin@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.