All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: Could not achieve wire speed for 40GE with any DPDK version on XL710 NIC's
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:44:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALgsdbc93MvV+yiHjSKM-cxQ=P+4LvsKqsBfA8Z=0d648t0+Fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANDrEHkz+F9HTVNwQrJ7f=93qUb2AJgUKmFKJ2BWctEp-0H4fA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for answer, Vladimir! So we need look for x16 NIC if we want
achieve 40GE line rate...

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Looks like you ran into pcie bottleneck. So let's calculate xl710 rx only
> case.
> Assume we have 32byte descriptors (if we want more offload).
> DMA makes one pcie transaction with packet payload, one descriptor writeback
> and one memory request for free descriptors for every 4 packets. For
> Transaction Layer Packet (TLP) there is 30 bytes overhead (4 PHY + 6 DLL +
> 16 header + 4 ECRC). So for 1 rx packet dma sends 30 + 64(packet itself) +
> 30 + 32 (writeback descriptor) + (16 / 4) (read request for new
> descriptors). Note that we do not take into account PCIe ACK/NACK/FC Update
> DLLP. So we have 160 bytes per packet. One lane PCIe 3.0 transmits 1 byte in
> 1 ns, so x8 transmits 8 bytes  in 1 ns. 1 packet transmits in 20 ns.  Thus
> in theory pcie 3.0 x8 may transfer not more than 50mpps.
> Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
>
> 2015-06-29 18:41 GMT+03:00 Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello, Andrew!
>>
>> What NIC have you used? Is it XL710?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Theurer <atheurer@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have not used XL710 or i40e.
>> >> I have no opinion for those NICs.
>> >>
>> >> Keunhong.
>> >>
>> >> 2015-06-29 15:59 GMT+09:00 Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello!
>> >> >
>> >> > Lee, thank you so much for sharing your experience! What do you think
>> >> > about 40GE version of 82599?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > DISCLAIMER: This information is not verified. This is truly my
>> >> > > personal
>> >> > > opinion.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > As I know, intel 82599 is the only 10G NIC which supports line rate
>> >> > > with
>> >> > > minimum sized packets (64 byte).
>> >> > > According to our internal tests, Mellanox's 40G NICs even support
>> >> > > less
>> >> > than
>> >> > > 30Mpps.
>> >> > > I think 40 Mpps is the hardware capacity.
>> >
>> >
>> > This is approximately what I see as well.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Keunhong.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 2015-06-28 19:34 GMT+09:00 Pavel Odintsov
>> >> > > <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Hello, folks!
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> We have execute bunch of tests for receive data with Intel XL710
>> >> > >> 40GE
>> >> > >> NIC. We want to achieve wire speed on this platform for traffic
>> >> > >> capture.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> But we definitely can't do it. We tried with different versions of
>> >> > >> DPDK: 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0. And have not success.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> We achieved only 40Mpps and could do more.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Could anybody help us with this issue? Looks like this NIC's could
>> >> > >> not
>> >> > >> work on wire speed :(
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Platform: Intel Xeon E5 e5 2670 + XL 710.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> --
>> >> > >> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>> >> >
>> >
>> > -Andrew
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>
>



-- 
Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-01 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-28 10:34 Could not achieve wire speed for 40GE with any DPDK version on XL710 NIC's Pavel Odintsov
2015-06-28 23:35 ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-29  6:59   ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-06-29 15:06     ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-29 15:38       ` Andrew Theurer
2015-06-29 15:41         ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-07-01 12:06           ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2015-07-01 12:44             ` Pavel Odintsov [this message]
2015-07-01 12:59               ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-01 13:05                 ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-07-01 13:40                   ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2015-07-01 14:22                     ` Anuj Kalia
2015-07-01 17:32                       ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2015-07-01 18:01                         ` Anuj Kalia
2015-07-03  8:35                           ` Pavel Odintsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALgsdbc93MvV+yiHjSKM-cxQ=P+4LvsKqsBfA8Z=0d648t0+Fw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pavel.odintsov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=medvedkinv@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.