From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsjDO-0004iD-Mb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 00:26:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsjDN-0003OZ-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 00:26:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1466528974-12183-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Vijay Kilari Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 09:56:20 +0530 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fw: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 0/6] Runtime pagesize computation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Kumar, Vijaya" , Patch Tracking , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , "prasun.kapoor" Hi Peter, On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 19 July 2016 at 12:04, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 19 July 2016 at 12:01, Vijay Kilari wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Any update on this patch set. Is it merged? >> >> No. It's an RFC patchset really, and it was posted during softfreeze, >> so I never expected or intended it to be merged before the 2.7 >> release. It also needs a respin to address some of the review comments >> I got on it. >> >> What would be useful in getting it further forward would be >> some good performance benchmarking of more than just migration. >> In particular whether it improves the speed in TCG emulation >> mode of aarch64 guests and whether that assert in the definition >> of TARGET_PAGE_BITS is particularly performance-draining. > > If I do a respin of this patchset is anybody willing to do > the actual perf benchmarking of the TCG emulation? > Otherwise this is unlikely to go into 2.8. I can help you. Let me know details on benchmarkings to be done. Also, a reference/details about running arm64 guests in TCG mode would be helpful. Regards Vijay