All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
	Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t4202 (log): add failing test for log with subtree
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 04:22:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mO0L4YrZFGmzWkiO4V18p-ydKyjVOe4vJ2H-d7Kz+qOw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vmwsqns4p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I have forgotten about this topic (and its numerous iterations in
> the past), but it appears me that people mostly lost interest after
> v7 review cycle where the series looked like a solution that is
> looking for a problem.

I agree.  Over-generalizing the problem is going nowhere.  I have some
ideas in my head, but I think I'm at the brink of insanity again:

We have a special type of merge commit that has 'bind' lines
corresponding to the trees of the commits we just merged in: each line
references a tree and a prefix.  Then, a diff between the merge's tree
and one of these trees can easily tell us what changes were introduced
by each side.  And here's the bomb: if we consider extending it to
include a blob-like buffer, we can use it to store submodule-like
information for each prefix.  Everything would just work out of the
box with a few minor adjustments:

1. We have to modify our packing algorithm to not reach out beyond ^1
of these special merge commits.  This means object-store isolation
(not $GITDIR isolation).  And it means that submodules can be cloned
and removed at will.

2. We have to maintain a symbolic ref for each prefix.  A commit
invoked from a special-commit referenced subdirectory will update this
symref.  Ofcourse, this means that we need to namespace our refs/ and
refs/remotes sensibly.

3. Git commands will take into account $CWD very strongly, and just
DTRT all the time.  Whether you're looking from the submodule
perspective or the superproject perspective.

Am I making any sense?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-22 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-22 12:08 [PATCH] t4202 (log): add failing test for log with subtree Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 12:11 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-04-22 12:17   ` Thomas Rast
2013-04-22 12:37     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 12:54       ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 12:29   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 12:36     ` Matthieu Moy
2013-04-22 13:15 ` Thomas Rast
2013-04-22 13:19   ` Thomas Rast
2013-04-22 14:30   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 14:57     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 15:24     ` Thomas Rast
2013-04-22 15:46       ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 15:50       ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 15:54         ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 17:29           ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 19:15             ` Thomas Rast
2013-04-22 19:54               ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 21:00                 ` Philip Oakley
2013-04-22 21:08                   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 21:23                     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 21:06               ` Matthieu Moy
2013-04-22 21:59                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-22 22:52                   ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2013-04-22 22:59                     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 23:55                     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-23  7:53                       ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-23 16:03                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-23 16:29                           ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 16:32       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-22 18:00         ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-22 18:18           ` Matthieu Moy
2013-04-22 19:09           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-22 20:39         ` Ramkumar Ramachandra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALkWK0mO0L4YrZFGmzWkiO4V18p-ydKyjVOe4vJ2H-d7Kz+qOw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.