From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] memcg: introduce per-memcg reclaim interface
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:08:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4-fKfv6vbZPZ3nCE=Bue4FUnC+9t27wsznmyd+JKgDbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAPL-u-za-TTyyC5uMVev9eQyhxZS7q3pVqaUxCFjqk+Sv9+ig@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 1:14 PM Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> -EAGAIN sounds good, too. Given that the userspace requests to
> reclaim a specified number of bytes, I think it is generally better to
> tell the userspace whether the request has been successfully
> fulfilled. Ideally, it would be even better to return how many bytes
> that have been reclaimed, though that is not easy to do through the
> cgroup interface.
What would be the challenge on returning the number of bytes reclaimed
through cgroup interface?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 8:41 [PATCH resend] memcg: introduce per-memcg reclaim interface Yosry Ahmed
2022-03-31 17:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-01 6:01 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 6:01 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 9:11 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 9:11 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 18:39 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-01 21:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-01 21:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-01 21:21 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-01 21:38 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 21:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-04 17:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-04-04 17:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-04 17:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-01 9:15 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 9:15 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 15:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-04-01 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-01 16:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-04 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-04 18:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-03-31 19:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-01 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-01 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-01 3:38 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 9:17 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 9:17 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 13:03 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-01 13:03 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-01 3:05 ` Chen Wandun
2022-04-01 3:05 ` Chen Wandun
2022-04-01 9:20 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 9:48 ` Chen Wandun
2022-04-01 9:48 ` Chen Wandun
2022-04-01 10:02 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 4:05 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 4:05 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 9:22 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 9:22 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 15:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-01 20:14 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 21:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-01 21:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-04-04 17:08 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2022-04-05 2:30 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-05 10:09 ` Michal Koutný
2022-04-01 8:39 ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-04-01 9:23 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-04 3:50 ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-04-04 17:18 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-04-01 13:54 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-01 16:56 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-01 16:56 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-02 8:13 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-03 6:46 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-03 6:56 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-06 0:48 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-06 1:07 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-06 1:07 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-06 2:49 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-06 2:49 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-06 5:02 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-06 6:32 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-06 7:05 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-06 8:49 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-06 8:49 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-06 20:16 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-06 20:16 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-07 7:35 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 21:26 ` Tim Chen
2022-04-07 22:07 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-07 22:12 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-07 22:12 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-07 23:11 ` Tim Chen
2022-04-08 2:10 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-08 2:10 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-08 3:08 ` Huang, Ying
2022-04-08 4:10 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-08 4:10 ` Wei Xu
2022-04-04 17:09 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALvZod4-fKfv6vbZPZ3nCE=Bue4FUnC+9t27wsznmyd+JKgDbg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.