All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: add per-memcg total kernel memory stat
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:26:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod5GrC9jgiLUBf9WVwmjPaRx-pKFTrnpZHswqpqKgT5BuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220201200823.3283171-1-yosryahmed@google.com>

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:08 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote:
>
> Currently memcg stats show several types of kernel memory:
> kernel stack, page tables, sock, vmalloc, and slab.
> However, there are other allocations with __GFP_ACCOUNT
> (or supersets such as GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT) that are not accounted
> in any of those stats, a few examples are:
> - various kvm allocations (e.g. allocated pages to create vcpus)
> - io_uring
> - tmp_page in pipes during pipe_write()
> - bpf ringbuffers
> - unix sockets
>
> Keeping track of the total kernel memory is essential for the ease of
> migration from cgroup v1 to v2 as there are large discrepancies between
> v1's kmem.usage_in_bytes and the sum of the available kernel memory stats
> in v2. Adding separate memcg stats for all __GFP_ACCOUNT kernel
> allocations is an impractical maintenance burden as there a lot of those
> all over the kernel code, with more use cases likely to show up in the
> future.
>
> Therefore, add a "kernel" memcg stat that is analogous to kmem
> page counter, with added benefits such as using rstat infrastructure
> which aggregates stats more efficiently. Additionally, this provides a
> lighter alternative in case the legacy kmem is deprecated in the future
>
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>

Thanks Yosry. Just to emphasize further, in our gradual migration to
v2 (exposing v2 interfaces in v1 and removing v1-only interfaces), the
difference between kernel memory from v1 and v2 is very prominent for
some workloads. This patch will definitely ease the v2 migration.

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-01 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-01 20:08 [PATCH] memcg: add per-memcg total kernel memory stat Yosry Ahmed
2022-02-01 20:26 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2022-02-01 21:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-02-01 22:01   ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-02-01 22:10   ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-02-02  0:47 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-02  5:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-02  5:41   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALvZod5GrC9jgiLUBf9WVwmjPaRx-pKFTrnpZHswqpqKgT5BuQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.