From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] pci cleanup and blacklist rework Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:39:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1453476464-31767-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <1454078953-23744-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <20160208143153.0a01f7fe@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Jan Viktorin Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CADE2EDA for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:39:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id s4so11275373oif.3 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:39:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160208143153.0a01f7fe@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello Jan, On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > I am confused a bit. I started to review the "[PATCH 0/9] prepare for rte_device > / rte_driver" series and then I've noticed there are 2 patch series having "pci: > no need for dynamic tailq init" patch there. But then, there is this v2 that does > not have this patch. What is the right one? What should I look at. Is related? I splitted this initial series, because I want to dissociate the work trying to get to rte_driver/rte_device from other work that modifies pci code (blacklist rework and "autobind"). I think you want to look at [1], but, if you want the global picture, first apply [1], then [2] ([2] is the v2 patchset which supersedes the initial patchset that had this "pci: no need for dynamic tailq init" patch in it). [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/032387.html [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/032398.html Regards, -- David Marchand