From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for driver directories Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:35:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Panu Matilainen Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E688E56 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:35:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by oiww128 with SMTP id w128so57315410oiw.2 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:35:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello Panu, On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > This mini-series adds support for driver directory concept as > described by Thomas Monjalon back in February: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013285.html > > Panu Matilainen (2): > eal: refactor plugin list append from eal_parse_args() to a helper > function > eal: add support for driver directory concept > > config/common_linuxapp | 3 ++ > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 1 + > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 76 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > This patchset looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should only have this for linux ? -- David Marchand