From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Herbert Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 0/5] fou: some fixes and updates Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:38:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1428692430-14465-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:37469 "EHLO mail-ig0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756220AbbDJUih (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:38:37 -0400 Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so7442622igb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:38:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1428692430-14465-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > Patch 1~3 fix some minor bugs in net/ipv4/fou.c, the only > thing I am not sure is if it's too late to change the > byte order of FOU_ATTR_PORT, if so we have to fix iproute2 > instead of kernel. > Is this a relic from previous patch set, or is there a reason you want to make this hbo? > Patch 4~5 add some new features to make it complete. > > v2: make fou->port be16 too > > Cong Wang (5): > fou: avoid calling udp_del_offload() twice > fou: exit early when parsing config fails > fou: always use be16 for port > fou: add network namespace support > fou: implement FOU_CMD_GET > I assume you didn't see any adverse performance impact with these patches? Acked-by: Tom Herbert Thanks! Tom > include/uapi/linux/fou.h | 1 + > net/ipv4/fou.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.8.3.1 >