From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Saeed Mahameed Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net/mlx5e: remove napi_hash_del() calls Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1479304537.8455.167.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1479306094.8455.181.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: David Miller , Saeed Mahameed , netdev To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:34168 "EHLO mail-qt0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753144AbcKPOfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:35:12 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n6so103541632qtd.1 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 06:35:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1479306094.8455.181.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > Calling napi_hash_del() after netif_napi_del() is pointless. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > Cc: Saeed Mahameed Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed