From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Saeed Mahameed Subject: Re: [pull request][for-next 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 13:08:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20171219203340.2600-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> <20171220.125631.1837619997849298593.davem@davemloft.net> <1513837142.18312.27.camel@mellanox.com> <20171221.100334.1424255317941540281.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171221.100334.1424255317941540281.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Linux Netdev List , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky , Doug Ledford List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:03 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Saeed Mahameed > Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:19:09 +0000 > >> On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 12:56 -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Saeed Mahameed >>> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:33:29 -0800 >>> >>> > This patchset is based on rc4 and I see that net-next is still on >>> > rc3, i hope >>> > this is not a problem. >>> >>> If it doesn't pull cleanly into net-next, then it would be a problem. >> >> It does pull cleanly. > > But if it is based upon rc4 I'll get tons of crap that is non-networking > related and you should never create a situation like that. > > That's not "cleanly" I see, I will fix that. Thanks Dave.