All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iio: Add new event type gesture and use direction for single and double tap
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 18:51:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM+2EuJWEOn-Vtaox=G3zXcd+zpx=mAhY1YHuNJx2XpAyPB1xg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220619135427.4ffc2d3d@jic23-huawei>

Hi Jonathan,

Sorry for the delay in replying.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:47:05 +0530
> Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Add new event type for tap called gesture and the direction can be used
> > to differentiate single and double tap. This may be used by accelerometer
> > sensors to express single and double tap events. For directional tap,
> > modifiers like IIO_MOD_(X/Y/Z) can be used along with singletap and
> > doubletap direction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@gmail.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> With fresh eyes I think we need to rethink the use of _period to make sure
> we have 'space' for another very like ABI element which is the maximum
> time between events for them to be considered a double tap.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c        |  5 ++++-
> >  include/uapi/linux/iio/types.h          |  3 +++
> >  tools/iio/iio_event_monitor.c           |  8 +++++++-
> >  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > index 3e00d7f7ee22..4eaf85e01911 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > @@ -2035,3 +2035,27 @@ Description:
> >               Available range for the forced calibration value, expressed as:
> >
> >               - a range specified as "[min step max]"
> > +
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_singletap_en
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_doubletap_en
> > +KernelVersion:       5.19
> > +Contact:     linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +             Device generates an event on a single or double tap.
> > +
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_singletap_value
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_doubletap_value
> > +KernelVersion:       5.19
> > +Contact:     linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +             Specifies the threshold value that the device is comparing
> > +             against to generate the tap gesture event. Units and exact
> > +             meaning of value are device specific.
>
> I'm fine with this one being device specific, as likely a complex alg
> involved.
>
> > +
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_doubletap_period
> > +KernelVersion:       5.19
> > +Contact:     linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +             Minimum time period between before and after the double tap
> > +             event. Units and exact meaning of period value are device
> > +             specific.
>
> I think the units need to be standard.  Also would this work better
> as a description?
>
>         Minimum time in seconds between the two taps making up a double
>         tap event.

The values for the time between the two taps are not in terms of seconds,
here period value is in terms of data samples which depends on
the data rate.

>
> Raises a question though. How would we specify the maximum time? I.e.
> if taps are further apart than Xseconds, they are reported as two single
> taps.
>
> Maybe reusing period here isn't a good idea and we need to have new ABI for
> this?
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-26 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13 19:17 [PATCH v1 0/2] iio: Add single and double tap events support Jagath Jog J
2022-06-13 19:17 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] iio: Add new event type gesture and use direction for single and double tap Jagath Jog J
2022-06-19 12:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-26 13:21     ` Jagath Jog J [this message]
2022-07-16 14:56       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-23  8:55         ` Jagath Jog J
2022-06-13 19:17 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] iio: accel: bma400: Add support for single and double tap events Jagath Jog J
2022-06-14  9:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-14 19:18     ` Jagath Jog J
2022-06-19 12:47       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-19 13:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-26 13:23     ` Jagath Jog J
2022-07-16 15:20       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-23  8:59         ` Jagath Jog J
2022-07-31 17:46           ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM+2EuJWEOn-Vtaox=G3zXcd+zpx=mAhY1YHuNJx2XpAyPB1xg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jagathjog1996@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.