All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf bench numa: use numa_node_to_cpus() to bind tasks to nodes
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:26:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cjLA29eOm6UU5FVE-Zeg7wm4bJaSdwMOH=ghDn=hfBo=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a002ebf17a3970e5d2dc7b9869dc180e68b88db4.1597004831.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:22 PM Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> It is currently assumed that each node contains at most
> nr_cpus/nr_nodes CPUs and node CPU ranges do not overlap.
> That assumption is generally incorrect as there are archs
> where a CPU number does not depend on to its node number.
>
> This update removes the described assumption by simply calling
> numa_node_to_cpus() interface and using the returned mask for
> binding CPUs to nodes. It also tightens a cpumask allocation
> failure check a bit.
>
> Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
> index 5797253..23e224e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
> @@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ static int is_node_present(int node)
>   */
>  static bool node_has_cpus(int node)
>  {
> -       struct bitmask *cpu = numa_allocate_cpumask();
> +       struct bitmask *cpumask = numa_allocate_cpumask();
>         unsigned int i;
>
> -       if (cpu && !numa_node_to_cpus(node, cpu)) {
> -               for (i = 0; i < cpu->size; i++) {
> -                       if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpu, i))
> +       BUG_ON(!cpumask);
> +       if (!numa_node_to_cpus(node, cpumask)) {
> +               for (i = 0; i < cpumask->size; i++) {
> +                       if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpumask, i))
>                                 return true;
>                 }
>         }
> @@ -288,14 +289,10 @@ static cpu_set_t bind_to_cpu(int target_cpu)
>
>  static cpu_set_t bind_to_node(int target_node)
>  {
> -       int cpus_per_node = g->p.nr_cpus / nr_numa_nodes();
>         cpu_set_t orig_mask, mask;
>         int cpu;
>         int ret;
>
> -       BUG_ON(cpus_per_node * nr_numa_nodes() != g->p.nr_cpus);
> -       BUG_ON(!cpus_per_node);
> -
>         ret = sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(orig_mask), &orig_mask);
>         BUG_ON(ret);
>
> @@ -305,13 +302,15 @@ static cpu_set_t bind_to_node(int target_node)
>                 for (cpu = 0; cpu < g->p.nr_cpus; cpu++)
>                         CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
>         } else {
> -               int cpu_start = (target_node + 0) * cpus_per_node;
> -               int cpu_stop  = (target_node + 1) * cpus_per_node;
> -
> -               BUG_ON(cpu_stop > g->p.nr_cpus);
> +               struct bitmask *cpumask = numa_allocate_cpumask();
>
> -               for (cpu = cpu_start; cpu < cpu_stop; cpu++)
> -                       CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
> +               BUG_ON(!cpumask);
> +               if (!numa_node_to_cpus(target_node, cpumask)) {
> +                       for (cpu = 0; cpu < (int)cpumask->size; cpu++) {
> +                               if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpumask, cpu))
> +                                       CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
> +                       }
> +               }

It seems you need to call numa_free_cpumask() for both functions.

Thanks
Namhyung

>         }
>
>         ret = sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-10  6:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] perf bench numa: make possible testing on uneven and/or overlapping CPU ranges Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-10  6:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf bench numa: use numa_node_to_cpus() to bind tasks to nodes Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-11  7:26   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2020-08-11  8:11     ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-13 11:30     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf bench numa: fix cpumask memory leak in node_has_cpus() Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-13 12:06       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-13 13:03         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-08-13 11:32     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf bench numa: use numa_node_to_cpus() to bind tasks to nodes Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-13 12:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-13 13:03         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-08-10  6:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf bench numa: fix number of processes in "2x3-convergence" test Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-11  7:27   ` Namhyung Kim
2020-08-12 12:07     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-08-10  6:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] perf bench numa: fix benchmark names Alexander Gordeev
2020-08-12 12:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM9d7cjLA29eOm6UU5FVE-Zeg7wm4bJaSdwMOH=ghDn=hfBo=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.