From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E4B07E00B45; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:40:33 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (diego.sueiro[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.215.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-lf0-f43.google.com (mail-lf0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949E9E00AAB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:40:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 78so64779202lfy.3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:40:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2ZE0CJl0bYYvXOUV8//BT/8CToNQM2Q9XWmlRTqQij4=; b=JHUSrnM7l/WOMxI2gS6QpVFltWm5DdvyMAVNB9yULWnslgbs/ozk41Mx6njq2XEy20 nm5DtDPFQeE94qeQI2+U+1F+fU7lDBAM3bT64IzEf8mrFagcUthFDM38LfpcNH7fMvxj OPH4xjpqgl1YnYUSjNtkJ9aM0zdOvGUhTdVSxG1GRJgNiXnn1QNZJcF+2pkUFRO3BaXJ Bnm0nT/PYEdrITKpzjneT0CBa6engU9j/a6Mkna8y2mSXZJRXSTGLV5xbTpeg+OeYsFm dWX68+H+P3kF4HYB7wDFjqnA127373cCVgcRGSwEMEpZkJGW6jro6RmN0bN8SlqMw28u uoqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=2ZE0CJl0bYYvXOUV8//BT/8CToNQM2Q9XWmlRTqQij4=; b=EMKLvpQD3TYGf1ZfChQdcCwW/Q4WxzdXvfYdtayk0mWp672ezeyQmmZbwP9//3NEjd k8DcoccALiGQXXWQUE1CZggEIQfpDSI4XKbzwOfCBqB8A1j2LFI3fPg1xSdWhnlDoVCe QXSsh3m5AN2jOLp/jmQHE3ttqN3O7jQVcNk8nb5DIwuj+eyiP18j6J/BWS4kgVm9bqcB jCOMKl75M2JgSAWRV6Tql4JhTMG+XnOYZenrP8Jhdi6cm6BY8aw0c80ZpboqSorpK2xQ OzJ7Oace+musCkD6CqCocYv8fxfoO6KwA1gt4mEN9/MZO0wWWlpYWBKvi1+psPhvML3F k44g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSdq/cV8KaXlu9Ey0GPUGFhWFzAF+hA3890kCWlxhhJmfOpITixkKDL9ElbvScoc0P0wUL8czn6kP9tsA== X-Received: by 10.25.138.2 with SMTP id m2mr10780384lfd.59.1454402426390; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:40:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.171.168 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:40:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3BA28CC0-59D4-4013-BD2E-3CAE31B1159D@gmail.com> References: <3BA28CC0-59D4-4013-BD2E-3CAE31B1159D@gmail.com> From: Diego Sueiro Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:40:06 +0000 Message-ID: To: Khem Raj Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Migrate, or not Migrate, that's the question!!! X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:40:34 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ebb56fc4ea9052ac5737d --001a113ebb56fc4ea9052ac5737d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Khem, On 1 February 2016 at 18:34, Khem Raj wrote: > > I think you have to think about what you are getting into. You are trying > to mix quite two different things are create third one. If I were you, I > would just > keep myself synced with upstream as much as I could, Don=E2=80=99t look o= ne way, > you have to look into time and effort you will spend on maintaining this = new > jargon for years to come. > Thanks for your opinion. I agree with you, but this decision is out of my responsibility. We already had problems on backporting device drivers and packages. I believe that for the next generation of the product we'll try to keep synced with upstream, but until then I want to try to use a recent version of Yocto/OE. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro Administrador do Embarcados www.embarcados.com.br /*long live rock 'n roll*/ --001a113ebb56fc4ea9052ac5737d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Khem,

On 1 February 2016 at 18:34, Khem Raj= <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

I think you have to think about what you = are getting into. You are trying to mix quite two different things are crea= te third one. If I were you, I would just
keep myself synced with= upstream as much as I could, Don=E2=80=99t look one way, you have to look = into time and effort you will spend on maintaining this new
jargo= n for years to come.

Thanks for your opinion.

I agree= with you, but this decision is out of my responsibility.

We already had proble= ms on backporting device drivers and packages.
I believe that for the next generation of the product we'll try to = keep synced with upstream, but until then I want to try to use a recent ver= sion of Yocto/OE.


Regards,

--
*dS
Diego S= ueiro

Administrador do Embarcados
www.embarcados.com.br=

/*long live rock 'n roll*/
--001a113ebb56fc4ea9052ac5737d--