From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 810D6E00B45; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:07:48 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (diego.sueiro[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D06E00AAB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:07:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 78so65215288lfy.3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:07:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=GoQFoQG7u3CtL7+rgWhPc97zHvCJQ29vcCpORkO3X/o=; b=l3g7jTF0+8Eb3hu+rzxy/nIfr2cDfsFv+B+y//SJFJBmPQEAP1Eo1QUXcd2jvQh7Nb GnMm23hgODePg0HDjc1AotfA3oaTjjWO+6nw3dQKOP+RED56U1yp3pU3ML7h6+j4FGij c7vN+U1navvyKkD6nN79iKWbC3JtdRz/lMoWWVg8C3NsbHD3RD1R3kp323GxHjqUm956 bMzIBmTJNQMp2Oa+DV4grfulaX/V+kVYBU+mI0BMiheFZPq/Opdz//ZaJ46Xm3qeEipx Kc+QGECH1gLFCsXo5s+OWY3Gsfkmf5Qz6saYUAPTe51PcyJO90AwiSol6dO0XGrFccE+ AcBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GoQFoQG7u3CtL7+rgWhPc97zHvCJQ29vcCpORkO3X/o=; b=PAdG0XLpRvz2w+khstW6Dl5aARJjQXne58+7feRa5tZR7cC87LuEJjXRiDN0++rBEV 4//w+MOFJ/TLz/bIqnhNN9rRjXa1QPmPUpjSgYJU50HC4pt7z/h1nMCAjoVJE9VVm4Jg Y2dM4/d8tD3pXIz+kZCWo19I6nHuiWFbhB/ReOVGsV6EWZYGeUN3OSXGtVWyEUBf271p JHNBKMmzObB7xf2kUVtk3Xzdm89hsMClgEzWmuaNfLAZV13o2gaUgtYejmVVY5afS2+r wZnPSDpzrN2CfEx8NhzkVfE0Kbvntwcz1BIjDpO+aXAfNL+Mmtfa5ZFcC4tFdMjCNaGW /XFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTS9dOg2dwwyrBF5q2ba3+ggN9Y9ImSP6T+DlS5K2lxX8pfvfgbDxRImYE/DnNC9C0yuyDWxPWq2IbJEA== X-Received: by 10.25.88.77 with SMTP id m74mr8264511lfb.149.1454404063055; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:07:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.171.168 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:07:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3BA28CC0-59D4-4013-BD2E-3CAE31B1159D@gmail.com> From: Diego Sueiro Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:07:23 +0000 Message-ID: To: Khem Raj Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Migrate, or not Migrate, that's the question!!! X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:07:48 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141f2cc89d433052ac5d553 --001a1141f2cc89d433052ac5d553 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2 February 2016 at 08:40, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Khem, > > On 1 February 2016 at 18:34, Khem Raj wrote: > >> >> I think you have to think about what you are getting into. You are tryin= g >> to mix quite two different things are create third one. If I were you, I >> would just >> keep myself synced with upstream as much as I could, Don=E2=80=99t look = one way, >> you have to look into time and effort you will spend on maintaining this= new >> jargon for years to come. >> > > Thanks for your opinion. > > I agree with you, but this decision is out of my responsibility. > > We already had problems on backporting device drivers and packages. > I believe that for the next generation of the product we'll try to keep > synced with upstream, but until then I want to try to use a recent versio= n > of Yocto/OE > And just to keep it clear. We are talking about a project with 272 packages and 1.5 MLOC (proprietary embedded code) which took 4 years to be developed= . Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro Administrador do Embarcados www.embarcados.com.br /*long live rock 'n roll*/ --001a1141f2cc89d433052ac5d553 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 2 February 2016 at 08:40, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com= > wrote:
Khem,

On 1 February 2016 at 18:34, Khem Raj &l= t;raj.khem@gmail.co= m> wrote:

I think you have to think about what you are getting into. You are trying= to mix quite two different things are create third one. If I were you, I w= ould just
keep myself synced with upstream as much as I could, Do= n=E2=80=99t look one way, you have to look into time and effort you will sp= end on maintaining this new
jargon for years to come.

Thanks for your opinion.

I agree with you, but this decis= ion is out of my responsibility.

=
We already had problems on backporting device dr= ivers and packages.
I believe that for the = next generation of the product we'll try to keep synced with upstream, = but until then I want to try to use a recent version of Yocto/OE


And just to keep it clear. We are talking about a pro= ject with 272 packages and 1.5 MLOC (proprietary embedded code) which took = 4 years to be developed.


Regards,

--
*dS
= Diego Sueiro

Administrador do Embarcados
www.embarcados= .com.br

/*long live rock 'n roll*/
--001a1141f2cc89d433052ac5d553--