2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com>

I'll jump in one more time...

Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir?

recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine>
defconfig
my-own.patch

I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works.
Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2
at the time.

Andrea,

I did it before and not worked.

I'll do it again just to make sure.

Regards,

--
*dS
Diego Sueiro

/*long live rock 'n roll*/

2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
>>
>> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since
>> this is a yocto list/question),
>
> I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the same core
> components, classes and functions.
>
>>
>> My build shows:
>>
>> meta
>> meta-yocto
>> meta-yocto-bsp    = "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6"
>> meta-ti           = "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d"
>> meta-alphalem     = "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908"
>> meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2"
>>
>> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't
>> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass
>> and the yocto kernel processing that matters.
>
> I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard (dylan) and
> meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues.
>
>>
>> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the
>> following content:
>>
>> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend
>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:"
>>
>> inherit kernel
>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
>>
>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)"
>>
>> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig"
>> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg"
>>
>> And I added a fragment which has:
>>
>> > cat my_frag.cfg
>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y
>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y
>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
>>
>> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS
>> transition from =m to =y:
>>
>> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS *
>> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m
>> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y
>>
>> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following:
>>
>> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config
>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y
>>
>> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied
>> to the configuration phase.
>>
>> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a
>> standstill to reproduce any problems.
>>
>> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows
>> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options
>> are not present, but I just want to be sure.
>
> For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure I've checked
> .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS.
> For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> *dS
> Diego Sueiro
>
> /*long live rock 'n roll*/
>

> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>

I'll jump in one more time...

Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir?

recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine>
defconfig
my-own.patch

I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works.
Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2
at the time.

Regards

Andrea